Knitting History Forum 2021 Conference Report

This year’s Knitting History Forum Conference was a fascinating and informative journey through knitting history and traditions featuring a roster of informative speakers presenting papers on a diverse range of topics making the 13th of November 2021 event a well-rounded conference. The theme for 2021 was Heads, Hands and Feet and the conference examined knitted artefacts and evidence of their production and social context from the 16th to the 19th centuries. The conference was a virtual, online event similar to last year, kicking off with 10 am start. For those of us in Ontario, Canada however, the conference started at an early 5 am. And that early morning alarm clock wake-up was so very well worth it!

Conference presentation topics included:

  • Knitted caps from the 16th century and their relation to the fez
  • Stockings and stocking production in 16th and 17th century England and The Netherlands
  • 18th century bluestockings
  • Hand-knitting in the Indian subcontinent
  • Knitting literature and practice in the 19th century
  • Early liturgical gloves
  • And so much more!

Conference speakers were Kirstie Buckland, Gieneke Arnolli, Lesley O’Connell Edwards, Pat Poppy, Hanna Bäckström, Jane Malcolm-Davies, Angharad Thomas, Pragya Sharma, Constance Willems and Nicole Pohl as well as a follow-up by Sandy Black on her presentation at the 2020 KHF Conference.

Knitted caps from the Sixteenth century

The day’s programme opened with Kirstie Buckland, Hon President, of the Knitting History Forum, who presented From fleece to fez in fifteen steps: an interpretation of the 1571 Cappers Act in the 21st century. Buckland shared information about the history of woollen caps and British cappers who made them, writing that, “The wool caps were widely appreciated from the 13th century to the changing fashions of the 16th century.” Buckland noted a marked similarity between surviving British woollen caps in historical collections and the production of fez caps in Tunis today. On a trip to Tunis, Buckland happened upon a stall of a fez maker and discovered that, like the early British caps, the modern Tunisian fezzes were actually knit first and then fulled. She watched as the artisan used a teasel to full the knitted caps, a process no doubt similar to the method employed by British cappers.

Harlingen hosiery shops in the 17th century

Next up was Gieneke Arnolli, former curator of the Fries Museum, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands who gave a presentation on Inlandic, Foreign and Speckled Stockings from Harlingen hosiery shops in the 17th century. Arnolli based her paper on inventories, from between 1637 and 1668, of hosiery shops in Harlingen, a harbour town in Friesland (Fryslân), the large, northwestern Dutch province. At the time, Harlingen was the northern gateway of the Republic of the United Netherlands.

Arnolli reported that knitted stockings or “hose” could be bought ready-made in the 17th century, making them an early form of ready-to-wear clothing, as well as valuable exporting items. The craft of stocking knitting was done by men and women, who were members of a guild. Most of the Harlingen stocking shops were held in the name of (married) women; and there were always two women involved in inventorying, as licenced valuers. The stockings traded in the shops were nearly always made of wool. The shops were like workshops with knitting supplies on hand such as knitting yarn, whalebones or iron wire for making knitting needles, and moulds in the shape of a leg for stretching the knitted stockings around.

Elizabethan and Jacobean Hand-knitted Stockings

Lesley O’Connell Edwards, an Independent Researcher from the UK, then presented her paper, From anecdote to statistic: in search of quantifiable data for the volume of production and trade in hand knitted stockings made from wool in England in the later Elizabethan and Jacobean periods.

Edwards’ paper shows that it is possible to provide quantifiable data when it comes to the history of stocking knitting. From her abstract: “After touching on the amount of wool that might be needed for a pair of stockings, the paper will concentrate on the number of stockings being produced and traded, both within England and as exports, and reveal who the traders could be.  It will then consider knitters as a socio-economic group and produce an estimate of how many there could be in the early seventeenth century. Finally, it will show how sometimes different categories of records can be brought together to paint a broader picture of stocking knitting, using (fine) jersey stocking knitting in Norwich and Yarmouth as a case study.”

Knitted garments in Seventeenth century accounts

After the break, Pat Poppy reported on knitted garments in Stuart accounts with “3 pounds Wostid in niting”: Knitted garments in Stuart accounts. From the abstract: “An ongoing project created a database of information on clothing from the Stuart period. The database contains around 23,000 references, only a few are to knitting or to knitted garments. These do however provide an insight into what was being produced and how. The bulk of the garments are stockings, followed by small numbers of gloves, cuffs, a waistcoat and a doublet.” Poppy’s presentation examined changing terminology, particularly around references to stockings, the extent to which knitted items were purchased or ordered and the values put on the finished items, including cost of yarn and cost of knitting.

Nineteenth century stocking knitting literature

Hanna Backstrom’s paper, “There are few ladies who cannot knit stockings” – Printed instructions, norms and practice in the nineteenth century, was next in the presentation lineup. Bäckström, PhD in Textile Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden, explained that in research on the history of knitting, stockings are often mentioned as a key item. The stockings themselves are often well described but the development of the printed instructions on how to make them has not been given the same attention. Backstrom’s paper examines how the publication of instructions for knitting stockings changed over time. She also explored what was thought of as women’s work in nineteenth century Sweden and how knitting was considered to be an appropriate activity for women from all social backgrounds, as professional livelihood, domestic chore or ladylike accomplishment, but interestingly, “Most of the printed manuals were aimed at middle- and upper-class women, and in these publications the knitting of stockings was framed as a fashionable, graceful and feminine activity, tied to bourgeoisie gender ideals.”

Examining the body of evidence for early knitting.

Knitting History Forum Conference November 2021 presentation by Jane Malcolm-Davies with KHF Chair Sandy Black

Jane Malcolm-Davies, Associate professor of textile analysis, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, presented her paper, Heads, hands and feet: Examining the body of evidence for early knitting. Malcolm-Davies has been working at developing a more scientific approach to historic textile studies. In her abstract, she writes, “Rigorous object-based research (at the macro and micro-level) promised by scientific enquiry and the insights offered by craft expertise now need to be integrated into the interpretive framework of traditional contextual studies of dress and textile history. “  Malcolm-Davies notes that our understanding of prehistoric and ancient dress has been increased by “innovative cross-cultural academic collaboration” and points out study of early modern garments could also reap the benefit of further interdisciplinary work : “Textile and dress history offers similarly fertile ground for new teams of collaborators to harvest new knowledge.”

Malcolm-Davies’ presentation was quite enlightening. Textile study can blaze a trail, Malcolm-Davies stated, integrating many facets of scientific investigation including technical, scientific, and craft. According to Malcolm-Davies, “We are all digital archaeologists.”

Holy Hands: Studies of knitted liturgical gloves

This paper, presented by Angharad Thomas and Lesley O’Connell Edwards, shared the findings of the Holy Hands project, which ran between March 2020 and August 2021, researching knitted liturgical gloves. The Knitting in Early Modern Europe (KEME) and Holy Hands research projects came together to catalogue nearly 100 examples of knitted liturgical gloves.

“The project to date has identified ninety-six knitted liturgical gloves in collections worldwide, which have been added to the online database at Angharad and Lesley provided links to photographs and added details according to the protocol for recording evidence for early knitting developed by Dr Jane Malcolm-Davies, Ruth Gilbert and Susanne Lervad. Dr Sylvie Odstrčilová contributed to the examination and recording of the knitted gloves, much of which was achieved remotely owing to the challenges of covid and travel restrictions.”

Thomas used the Protocol for Recording Early Knitwork mentioned above, a textile identification form originally published in Archaeological Textiles Review No. 60. The form outlines 9 categories including item identification, item material, and yarn structure and fabric structure to name a few. This form would be of great help to researchers new to textile identification and working at reproductions. This knitter is definitely interested in using the protocol for future reconstruction projects.

Hand Knitting in the Indian subcontinent

Pragya Sharma of the Indian Institute of Art and Design (IIAD), New Delhi, India, shared her paper on handknitting in India with the fascinating presentation, From jorab (socks) to dastana (gloves): Tracing provenance of hand knitting in the Indian subcontinent. Sharma provided a survey of the history of knitting in India, touching on the knitting contributions of various groups of people including the Moravian missionaries who brought their own knitting traditions to India. Sharma’s abstract states, “Hand knitting is a widely practised craft by women in contemporary India, irrespective of age, culture, or class and this has been the case since the eighteenth century. The earliest reference to knitting from the subcontinent is from the seventeenth century by Dutch colonisers.” The images Sharma shared of the mittens and gloves were quite striking. The pattern motifs, placement of colours (for instance the red-tipped glove fingers) and overall colour choices were quite different than patterns this knitter has come across; the frequent use of reds was quite eye-catching and beautiful.

Reconstructing Sixteenth Century Dutch Stockings

Knitting History Forum Conference November 2021 presentation by Constance Willems with an image of a stocking from 1540Constance Willems, a designer, researcher and writer from the Netherlands presented, Little 16th Century Feet. The hidden secret of Dutch Groningen´s knitted stocking of 1540, excavated in 2000 in the canal Gracht van Alva, Prinsenstraat 11 in Groningen and reconstructed in 2020 in the Netherlands. Willems spoke about the reconstructions of knitted stockings from the canal Gracht van Alva and handknitting in Groningen. In her abstract, Willems wrote about her reconstruction experience this way, “… as I am reconstructing and have reached the point where I have to decrease the rows of the heel, something very special happens…. and what I thought the heel was, suddenly under my knitting hands, becomes a beautifully shaped part of the sole.”

This point I found very exciting and an encouraging note to any stitcher attempting a recreation. There is so much value in trying to make the old new again as new information can be revealed during the process. An old wool stocking is not just an old wool stocking – it’s a valuable piece of material culture deserving of attention. Things are not always what they seem or what we expect. The process of reconstruction reveals more information than a visual inspection can ever provide.

Knitwits: Knitting the Bluestockings

In her paper titled Knitwits: Knitting the Bluestockings. Knitting and the 18th century salon, Nicole Pohl, Oxford Brookes University, UK, explored the material culture of the famous eighteenth-century salon of the Bluestockings with a specific focus on the material production and iconography of the ‘blue stockings’. The basis for the paper are the original letters written by the Bluestockings as digitised and edited by The Elizabeth Montagu Correspondence Online (EMCO). Pohl’s abstract explains, “The Bluestockings were a group of men and women who met in the London, Dublin and Bath homes of fashionable hostesses Elizabeth Montagu, Elizabeth Vesey (c.1715-91) and Frances Boscawen (1719-1805) from the 1750s.” Pohl shared that eventually the label ‘Bluestockings’ came to designate, often in a negative sense, a group of learned and intellectual women.

Kate Davies, a Scottish knit designer, established a modern Bluestockings Club in May 2021. The Bluestockings Club celebrates and explores the lives and work of the important group of intellectual women known as the “bluestockings” by examining the history of sock knitting and knitting their own bluestockings.

Classic Knits of the 1980s

Sandy Black, London College of Fashion, University of the Arts London, UK, shared her book, Classic Knits of the 1980s – a book of colourful knitwear designs. In Part 1 of the book, Black shared her own approach to designing and gathering inspiration, her design process, plus colourwork tips and techniques. Part 2 focused on her 24 knitting designs for sweaters, cardigans, jackets and longer-length tunics, and accessories. Conference delegates enjoyed looking through the images of various patterns and designs. Black’s beautiful colour, geometric and textural designs were praised and commented on, no doubt inspiring many to start a new project or two.

Heads, Hands and Feet – a wealth of information and inspiration

The Knitting History Forum Conference 2021 was packed full of information, the knowledgeable presenters representing an extensive, diverse network of historical knitting professionals. If you have a question about knitting history, you are not alone – this is the community that can help. As a knitter just getting into studying historic patterns and reproducing vintage knitted items (with no formal textile history training), this conference offered a wealth of useful information featuring many absorbing presentations. There was such a lot of information to take in; I look forward to seeing the recorded video presentations just so I can enjoy them all once more. Thank you to all the people who worked to make the conference a reality and to all the speakers who shared their extensive knowledge. Attending this knitting history conference was an invaluable, inspirational experience!

Sharlene Young-Bolen

If you would like to learn more, click the following link to read abstracts of the conference papers mentioned by Sharlene in her report. You can also keep up with the latest news from Knitting History Forum online:

Fleece To Fashion Knitting Conference 2022

An exciting prospect for knitting scholars for next year has been announced with the Call for Papers issued by the AHRC Fleece to Fashion project at the University of Glasgow, inviting proposals for a conference from Thursday 8th to Friday 9th September 2022.

Fleece to Fashion: Creativity, Authenticity and Sustainability in Knitted Textiles Past and Present will focus on the processes and practices associated with the production of knitted textiles, from home hand and machine knitting to factory production. Creativity in the use of design, materials and techniques; authenticity of materials and practices and sustainability of production methods have always been critical features of the success of Scotland’s knitters, designers, entrepreneurs and business owners, from the lace knitters of Shetland to the global companies of the 21st century. This conference aims to interrogate the diverse ways in which this sector has been inspired, supported and manifested, ranging from home knitting to renowned professional design, in Scotland and globally. It will be an hybrid event, with participation either in-person at the Sir Charles Wilson Building at the University of Glasgow, or online via Zoom webinar.

Proposals for individual 20 minute papers, panels of three papers and for poster presentations are invited, which should be research or practice-based and need not focus directly on knitting in Scotland. The conference organisers are particularly interested in contributions providing perspectives and experiences of practices of knitting in all contexts and peoples previously under-represented in studies of those practices. Proposals should comprise a 200 word description of the paper, panel or poster (panels require descriptions of all three papers), a one-page CV for each presenter, contact details (email/postal address) and a statement noting whether participation would be in person or online. The deadline for submissions is 15 January 2022, to be sent to

As well as a celebration of the long tradition of knitting in Scotland, this could be an useful springboard for early career academics and a wonderful opportunity to showcase new research and previously hidden histories of knitting and knitting cultures – something to consider as you have into the New Year to think about possible presentations. Further details are available at the Fleece to Fashion website

Knitting History Forum Conference 13th November 2021 – Abstracts

Extended abstracts of papers presented at the Knitting History Forum Conference on 13th November 2021.

From fleece to fez in fifteen steps: an interpretation of the 1571 Cappers Act in the 21st century
Kirstie Buckland – Hon President, Knitting History Forum, UK

Woollen caps and British cappers were widely appreciated from the 13th century to the changing fashions of the 16th century. Cappers guilds performed in the Corpus Christi pageants, prosperous members equipped shops, endowed manufactories, and became burgesses, aldermen, mayors and politicians.

The little information written about the cappers comes from other people, notably from the many statutes passed to control or encourage them. These established standards of quality and price. The late 16th century decline of the ‘craft, trade or science’ formerly employing 8,000 people in London, twice as many in the land beside’ threatened to increase poverty and crime. Were there really that many? While fifteen distinct callings were listed in the manufacture of caps (with ‘cappeknitters’ recorded from 1422) cappers combined with cardmakers, wiredrawers and pinners who provided some basic materials.

In 1571 unsuccessful legislation to enforce the wearing of woollen caps was intended to keep the country’s knitters working. As fashion changed exports dwindled, and cappers struggled to survive despite Queen Elizabeth’s helpful intervention.

It is impossible to know exactly how cappers worked, did they knit as we do now? Did they call it knitting (always spelt with a ‘k’). Who did what in the industrial hierarchy before mechanisation took over? The fifteen callings start with ‘Carders, Spinners, Knitters’ often seen as women’s jobs and obviously using woollen spun, short-stapled downland fleece, finishing and dyeing were more specialised, they were forbidden to make ‘any caps of any cloth not knit’. The use of ‘web yarn’ or of ‘cloth yarn’ was condemned as ‘deceitful practice’. 15th century scribes were not familiar with the word and it is often added above the line (Monmouth and Ripon) but most surviving caps found in museum collections are, in terms of present practice, knitted, fulled, raised and shorn, with some showing traces of dye.

Many were dispersed from early 20th century London excavations, others survived in small provincial towns, bogs in Ireland or Scotland, and shipwrecks such as Henry VIII’s warship the ‘Mary Rose’, or HMS de Braak.

We now have the scientific means to examine, analyse and provisionally date the surviving specimens which continue to surface, but cheaply made, easily seen and interpreted, knitted wool berets are still effective and adaptable in military, civilian and commercial use. (Montgomery, Che Guevara, Twiggy), More than 200,000 were made annually by a single French factory, except where the traditional ‘fez’ remains popular. On holiday in Tunis, just before the Arab Spring, I wandered through the souk where rows of identical shops in one area were selling identical fezes in various colours. To my surprise these fezes were knitted and finished using exactly the same methods that I think our cappers used. This was a working environment not a tourist show, the men were working on stacks of half-finished caps, using both traditional native teasels and metal ones (and their teeth) and delivered a mutter of angry Arabic at being interrupted. I was also unpopular with our group of tourists who did not share my excitement!  I bought my fez, carefully measured to fit, also a just-made undyed knitted ‘bag’ and a discarded metal fulling teasel.

Any Cap, whate’re it be
Is still the sign of some Degree.

(Elizabethan Ballad)


Inlandic, Foreign and Speckled Stockings – Harlingen hosiery shops in the 17th century
Gieneke Arnolli – 
Former curator, Fries Museum, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands

The basis for this paper is six inventories, from between 1637 and 1668, of hosiery shops in Harlingen, the mo st important harbour town of the Dutch province of Friesland. Harlingen was the northern gateway of the Republic of the United Netherlands.

Knitted stockings or “hose” could be bought ready-made in the 17th century, as opposed to other kinds of clothing, which were made to order. This made the stockings an early form of ready-to-wear clothing, as well as both in- and exported commodities. That Dutch stockings from that period are still extant is exclusively thanks to archaeological finds, such as the woollen stockings excavated in 1980 at Spitsbergen, (Svalbard, Norway) when archaeologists were in search of the clothing of whalers.

In the Harlingen shops amongst others English, Norwegian and Icelandic stockings were to be found beside Inlandic woollen stockings for men, women and children. However, skippers from Harlingen mainly transported stockings from the Netherlands to the Baltic region, as is shown by the registered passages through the Sound Tolls in Denmark.

The craft of knitting (of stockings) was plied by men as well as by women, who were members of a guild. The names of eight “hose knitters” can be found in 17th-century sources in Harlingen. Female knitters remained unnamed most of the time, but in the 1658 inventory of Antie Jans the name of a female knitter is mentioned, because of an outstanding debt which had to be paid to her. The prominent presence of women also becomes clear from the fact that most of the Harlingen stocking shops were held in the name of the (married) woman; and there were always two women involved in inventorying, as licenced valuers. The stockings’ prices varied from five stuivers (a stuiver –penny- is 1/20 worth of a guilder) to more than three guilders per pair, whereas the average daily wage of a craftsman amounted to one guilder at that time. Examination of the Harlingen inventories demonstrates how important the role of women was in the economic life of the town.

However, from the inventories much may also be deduced about the stockings themselves: for example that stockings traded in the shops were nearly always made of wool. This means that not only knitters, but also wool-combers and spinners were indispensable for the production. The wool-combers took care of preparing the fleeces for spinning, after which the wool was taken to spinners, mostly women, who would spin knitting yarns of various thicknesses from this.
Knitting yarn was available in greater or lesser amounts in all the shops. It isn’t clear whether this was intended for selling or as a stock for working with. There was a bunch of “walvisch bien” (whalebones) for making knitting needles in the shop of Isack Pytters Verhagen (1656). Iron wire was present for the same purpose in Jantien Cornelis’ shop (1657). The stocking shops were more like workshops, which is also apparent from the presence of “formen” (moulds) in the shape of a leg, for stretching the knitted stockings around. There will also have been pupils at work there, but no traces of them can be found in the inventories.


From anecdote to statistic: in  search of quantifiable data for the volume of production and trade in hand knitted stockings made from wool in England in the later Elizabethan and Jacobean periods
Lesley O’Connell Edwards
 – Independent Researcher, UK

Knitted items were becoming increasingly common through the sixteenth century in England, especially stockings.  However, little work has been done to put numbers to this expanding industry: Thirsk’s research nearly half a century ago suggested each person wore out at least two pairs of stockings a year, and Croft included figures from the London port books of the period in her research on the stocking export trade.  This paper aims to rectify that situation, and show that it is possible to provide far more quantifiable data.  After touching on the amount of wool that might be needed for a pair of stockings, the paper will concentrate on the number of stockings being produced and traded, both within England and  as exports, and reveal who the traders could be.  It will then consider knitters as a socio-economic group and produce an estimate of how many there could be in the early seventeenth century.  Finally, it will show how sometimes different categories of records can be brought together to paint a broader picture of stocking knitting, using (fine) jersey stocking knitting in Norwich and Yarmouth as a case study.

There is no one source of evidence for hand knitted stockings, as knitting was not a structured industry.  Material is scattered across a wide range of sources from national government papers, such as customs accounts and pardons in the patent rolls, through local government records to personal records, including letters, account books and inventories. Sometimes one has to ‘read between the lines’ – evidence is not neatly laid out, but needs to be deduced, such as realising that a number of stolen stockings was too large for household use, so the owner may have been intending to trade in these.  People’s lives were complex, and they often had multiple income streams: creating or trading in knitted items was only one of these.

What quantifiable data are available?

This paper shows that there is numerical evidence for a number of aspects:

  • How much wool / yarn was needed for a pair of stockings
  • Evidence of volume of trade from official records
  • The shaping of trade – what types, and how many stockings were individual merchants trading?
  • Who were the knitters?

How much wool / yarn made a pair of stockings?

The paper will discuss the usefulness of a generalisation of one pound of wool producing two pairs of stockings, which appears in several sources, and consider evidence from modern recreations of extant sixteenth century stockings in the Museum of London.  It will also discuss the proposed enterprise of Walter Morrell, who claimed he had obtained five pairs of stockings from one pound of wool, and was intending to train others to do so.

Evidence from official records.

The Tudor administration reformed the aulnage tax and customs systems in the latter half of the sixteenth century. Both of these reforms resulted in knitted stockings being added to the list of items on which duty was payable, which suggests that the government was aware that these were being produced in sufficient numbers to make it worthwhile taxing them.

Aulnage was a duty paid on finished items made from wool: how many evaded this duty is unknown.  Only two records have been traced: one from Norwich for 1580-1585 and one from Ipswich for 1594-1595.  The Norwich records are quarterly and the paper will use these to reveal the volume of stocking production, and also to suggest that there was no obvious seasonality to production.  Although the Ipswich document is simply a total, the paper will show that it demonstrates the types of stockings being made, and who was trading in them.

Port books can detail specific cargos that were being transported – but not all of these do, especially in the sixteenth century.  The records become more detailed after the beginning of the seventeenth century, and the paper will show that it is possible to put numbers to the export trade.  The paper will briefly show that the other end of the export trade can sometimes be traced, drawing on the data in the Danish Sound Toll registers in the period.

The shaping of trade – what and how many stockings were the merchants trading?

Port books also provide evidence of quantities that merchants were obtaining, and sending.  The numbers of stockings in a cargo was very variable – some merchants were sending as few as six or eight pairs, whilst others sent over 1,500 pairs.  The paper will use specific port books to show the range of quantities and types of stockings that were being exported, as well as other information about the traders; and to highlight the differences between London and other ports.

A range of other sources will be used to demonstrate how much stock a person trading in stockings might hold, and the range of types and values, including personal inventories, and pardons for theft in the Calendar of Patent Rolls.  Other evidence, such as personal correspondence, will show how the trade might simply be informal.  Traders must have had ways of obtaining stockings in quantity, and the little evidence that exists as to how they might have done this will be discussed.

Information about numbers of knitters

The paper will discuss the few sources that show information about knitters as a socio-economic group. This will include two surveys of the poor, made in Norwich in 1570 and Ipswich in 1597, which demonstrate that knitters were poor but could be of any age, or marital status.  Other evidence such as civic initiatives to train the poor to knit in order to earn a living and not be a burden on the poor rate, such as that in Salisbury in 1625, will be briefly discussed.

How many knitters might there have been in England?

The consensus amongst contemporaries was that a full-time knitter made two pairs of stockings a week (ignoring size and yarn type), and knitted for fifty weeks a year, excluding the Christmas period.  However, many knitters might only work in the slack periods in the agricultural period, or have other occupations as well as knitting, as the Norwich census reveals.

The paper will show that we can expand on Thirsk’s estimate of a minimum of 90,000 knitters creating two pairs for each of the minimum population of 4.5 million at the end of the sixteenth century.  It will utilise data for the early seventeenth century to arrive at an estimate of the number of knitters that includes those needed to produce the stockings for export.  It will also show that where the number of a group of knitters is known, such as in the Norwich census of the poor in 1570, then an estimate can be made of the number of stockings they would produce.

A case study: jersey stocking knitting in Norwich and Yarmouth.

Finally the paper will show that sometimes different records can be brought together to paint a broader picture of stocking knitting, and provide numeric evidence, using the example of jersey stocking knitting in Norwich and Yarmouth.  The paper will utilise different types of records to reveal the possible volume of this trade, including potential amount of wool used, who the knitters might have been and their wages, the volume of the trade, and those who were exporting the finished stockings, and discuss the reliability of the different sources.  These records include the writings of Thomas Wilson, a government official, and Walter Morrell, an entrepreneur, a return on official wool usage to a local J.P., the 1600-1601 port book for Yarmouth, and a Norwich inventory of 1617.


“3 pounds Wostid in niting”: Knitted garments in Stuart accounts
Pat Poppy – Independent researcher, UK

An ongoing project has created a database of information on clothing from the Stuart period (1603-1714). The database contains around 23,000 references, only a few are to knitting or to knitted garments. These do however provide an insight into what was being produced and how. The bulk of the garments are stockings, followed by small numbers of gloves, cuffs, a waistcoat and a doublet. The paper will examine the changing terminology, particularly around references to stockings, and if the textile description can indicate whether they are knit or not. It will also examine the extent to which knitted items were purchased, or ordered to be knitted, and the values put on the finished garments, to cost of yarn and the cost of knitting.

A 1611 seller of points, garters, and girdles, has two pair of knit stockings in stock.1 One hosier in 1623 has in stock five pairs of knit stockings, the rest of his stock are referred to as hose, raising the question of whether they are breeches or stockings.2 As late as the 1630s breeches could be referred to as hose, the King’s suits are described as doublet, hose and cloak.3 By the later part of the seventeenth century references to hose are almost certainly to stockings, a widow Agnes Noble in 1679 has in stock well over 100 pairs of hose, and some are referred to specifically as women’s hose.4

The 1623 hosier has Irish hose in stock, which are almost certainly cloth stockings. Irish stockings were the preference for American colonists at the time, as being, “much more serviceable than knit ones.” 5  Later suppliers do not mention whether or not the stockings are knit. Cloth stockings can be identified by the name of the textile, a 1661 seller has “paire dowlas stokens & on paire of Cotten stokens”.6 Stockings described as yarn or thread, are almost certainly knit as, in all probability, are worsted stockings. A 1691 wool comber not only has three pounds of worsted out “in niting,” but also large quantities of worsted wool with spinners, similar large amounts of worsted yarn in stock, and at least 74 pairs of worsted hose.7

References to items being knitted appear in several household accounts. In 1625 the Howards of Naworth Castle pay “for knitting 2 pair of stockings for the children 6d.”8 In 1645 John Willoughy in Devon paid “for knitting a pair of stockings of coarse melly yarn 2s 4d.”9 His Devon neighbours the Earl and Countess of Bath at Tawstock had several items knitted for their servants, as well as stockings there are references to “paid for knitting Mr Harris stockings and gloves 2s” and “paid for knitting cuffs 6d.” At least one item was knitted for the Earl himself, “paid Eliz: Umbles for knitting my Lord’s socks 2s”.10 James Master in the 1650s lists several payments both for the knitting of items and for the purchase of thread, “for 1 po[ound] and a hal[f] of thred to make 2 pair of stockings 4s 6d.” and later “for knitting 2 pa of stockings for Jack 2s 6d”.11

Apart from the 1611 points seller and the 1623 hosier it is sometimes difficult to tell if stockings in stock are knitted or not. The 1691 woolcomber’s stock is almost certainly all knitted. His hose for youths and women are 2s a pair, but other hose are listed at 2s 6d a pair. In 1668 in Kent George Johnson has socks at 4d a pair, children’s stockings at 5d a pair, boy’s grey stockings at 7d a pair, and men’s woollen stockings at 1s 0½d a pair.12 Earlier in the century in 1619, John Robinson, who describes himself as a yeoman but is selling both stockings and gloves has in stock “ninetien payer of wosted stockings £3 13s 2d, wollen stockings thirtye fower payer 57s 8d” and “thirteen payer of stockings for children 7s 7d”.13

Silk stockings are far more expensive. James Master pays 9 shillings for a pair black silk knit tops, probably for boot hose.14 The silk stockings purchased for the Earl and Countess of Bath ranged from 19 shillings to “a pair of green silk stockings for my Lord £2 10s”.15

The colours of the stockings are rarely mentioned, though silk stockings appear to come in a much wider range of colours than wool stockings. In 1699 a mercer divides his stockings into grey and coloured.16 Another mercer a year later in 1700 has stockings in blue and red as well as “dyed woosted at 2/1” a pair.17


  1. Atkinson, J A., et al eds. 1993, Darlington wills and inventories 1600-1625. Publications of the Surtees Society, vol 201, 111-114
  2. George, E. and S. eds. 2002, Bristol probate inventories, Part 1: 1542-1650. Bristol Records Society publication 54, 36
  3. Strong, Roy. 1980 Charles I’s clothes for the years 1633-1635. Costume, 14, 73-89
  4. George, E. and S. 2005, Bristol probate inventories, Part 2: 1657-1689. Bristol Records Society publication 57, 12
  5. Wood, William. New England’s Prospect. (London, 1639)
  6. George, E. and S. eds. 2005, Bristol probate inventories, Part 2: 1657-1689. Bristol Records Society publication 57, 12
  7. George, E. and S. eds. 2008, Bristol probate inventories, Part 3: 1690-1803. Bristol Records Society publication 60, 8-10, (Online at
  8. Ornsby, G. ed. 1878 Selections from the Household Books of the Lord William Howard of Naworth Castle. Publications of the Surtees Society, 68, 225
  9. Gray, Todd. 1995. Devon Household Accounts 1627-59. Part 1 Devon and Cornwall Record Society, new series, vol. 38, 257.
  10. Gray, Todd. 1996. Devon Household Accounts 1627-59. Part 2 Devon and Cornwall Record Society, new series, vol. 39, 62, 102 & 103.
  11. Robertson, S. ed. 1886. The expense Book of James Master 1646-1676 [Part 2, 1655-1657], transcribed by Mrs Dallison. Archaeologia Cantiana, 16, 241-259, 253
  12. Lansberry, H. C. F. ed. 1988. Sevenoaks wills and inventories in the reign of Charles II. Maidstone: Kent Archaeological Society. 75
  13. Phillips, C. B. and Smith, J. H., eds. 1985. Stockport probate records, 1578-1619. Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, vol. 124, 138-41
  14. Robertson, S. ed. (1887). The expense Book of James Master 1646-1676 [Part 3, 1658-1663], transcribed by Mrs Dallison. Archaeologia Cantiana, 17, 321-352, 340
  15. Gray, Todd. 1996. Devon Household Accounts 1627-59. Part 2 Devon and Cornwall Record Society, new series, vol. 39, 153
  16. Trinder, B. and Cox, J. 1980. Yeoman & Colliers in Telford: Probate Inventories for Wellington, Wrockwardine, Lilleshall and Dawley, 1660-1750. Phillimore, 305
  17. Trinder, B. and Cox, J. 1980. Yeoman & Colliers in Telford: Probate Inventories for Wellington, Wrockwardine, Lilleshall and Dawley, 1660-1750. Phillimore, 315


“There are few ladies who cannot knit stockings” – Printed instructions, norms and practice in the nineteenth century
Hanna Bäckström
 – PhD in Textile Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden

In research on the history of knitting, stockings are often mentioned as a key item. Extant stockings are often described, while the development of printed instructions on how to make them has not been as thoroughly explored. In this paper I study the norms and practices surrounding the act of knitting a stocking during the nineteenth century, by examining how the publication of instructions for knitting stockings changed over time. The sources range from the well-known instructions in The Knitting Teachers Assistant (1817) to lesser known manuals published in Germany, Denmark and Sweden from the early nineteenth century to the 1870s. To further explore how the act of knitting a stocking could express social identity other printed sources and portraits are also considered.

Part of the investigation was included in my newly published PhD thesis that explore the emerging market for printed patterns for knitting and crochet in the middle of the nineteenth century, Förmedling av mönsterförlagor för stickning och virkning. Medierna, marknaden och målgruppen i Sverige vid 1800-talets mitt (The mediation of patterns for knitting and crochet. The publications, the market and the target group in Sweden in the mid-nineteenth century).

In the early nineteenth century a market for printed knitting patterns first developed in the German speaking area. The first patterns for knitting were in the form of coloured grid patterns that conveyed motifs, such as a garland. These were sometimes combined with written instructions to communicate how to create a distinct form or a structure, such as a lace stocking. However, more often than not the the grid patterns were not accompanied by any written instructions. Prior knowledge on how to form a stocking, and how to incorporate a lace pattern or border on it, was expected of the target group of the patterns. An early and rare example of written instructions on how to knit stockings were included in Johann Friedrich Netto’s and Friedrich Leonhard Lehmann’s popular manual Die Kunst zu stricken in ihrem ganzen Umfange (The art of knitting in its entirety), published in several editions around the year 1800. The instructions are hard to understand today, and whether they were understandable for a German reader of that time can be discussed.

During the 1830s and 1840s there is a shift from manuals mostly containing grid patterns, to manuals where a combination of written instructions and illustrations are used. At the same time the function of the patterns change, from communicating how to form motifs, to communicating how to form shapes and structures. Basic instructions on how to form the stiches that make up the motif and pedagogical, step by step instructions first became a frequent part of the manuals in the 1840s. A standardised language of how to describe the craft was also developed during the 1840s.

One of the most prolific German authors of needlework manuals in the 1840s was Emma Hennings, whose manuals were also translated to Dutch, Danish and Swedish. To illustrate the instructions for knitting stockings from the mid-nineteenth century, Emma Hennings’ Anweisung zur Kunststrickerei (1843–1847) (Instructions in art knitting) is compared with the instructions of Danish knitting manual author Sine Andresen, Strikkebog til Skole- og Huusbrug (1845) (Knitting book for use at home and in schools).

In the mid nineteenth century knitting of stockings was common in all parts of society, both as sustenance and as a part of everyday household chores. Most of the printed manuals were aimed at middle and upper class women, and in these publications the knitting of stockings was framed as a fashionable, graceful and feminine activity, tied to bourgeoisie gender ideals. In the manuals, norms regarding what kind of objects should be fabricated, why, and by whom is also expressed. The target group, “fruntimmer” (ladies), are constructed as persons that had the means, time and need for a pastime, but this pastime should also be productive or beneficial – such as knitting thin cotton stockings for your family. By relating to established notions of gender and class, knitting is presented as important and meaningful occupations in the everyday life of middle-class women.

The ways in which knitting is described, for example as both productive and entertaining pastimes, can be viewed as part of the publishers’ strategy to make the manuals into desirable and fashionable commodities. In the manuals, the concepts of usefulness and entertainment are conspicuously tied to each other, making a convincing argument for a middle-class woman of the mid-nineteenth century to engage in knitting.

The connections between knitting and bourgeoisie gender ideals can also be seen in German and Danish portraits of bourgeoisie women, who were frequently depicted holding a knitting. The shape and colour of their knitting suggest that it was the making of cotton stockings that was depicted, rather than any other object that could be knitted.

Satirical articles in fashion journals and weeklies further emphasize that the knitting of stockings was a quintessential occupation for fashionable women. While stating that the stocking was present in the hands of women in all parts of genteel social life, the practice was also criticized for making girls antisocial, passive and inattentive to the courting of men. When performed too much, a task that signalled feminine virtue could also have the opposite effect.

While the task of knitting stockings was framed as a mandatory and fashionable task for bourgeoisie women in portraits, fashion journals and magazines in the mid nineteenth century, the popular knitting manuals of that period have none or very brief instructions on how to actually perform the task. The German, Danish and Swedish knitting manuals that were issued during the period 1830–1850 contain a lot of patterns for structures that can be used on stockings, such as lace patterns and borders. Technical aspects of how to actually form the stocking, such as instructions on how to form a heel, are often omitted. The omission of step-by-step instructions for knitting stockings in the manuals emphasize the cultural significance of this task, making it into something that the target group was just expected to know how to do. As is stated in both the German and Swedish edition of Hennings’ Anweisung zur Kunststrickerei: “There are few ladies who cannot knit stockings”.

In Sweden the first step-by-step instructions for making stockings was published in the 1870s. This was a translation of The Knitting Teachers Assistant, first published more than fifty years earlier. I will conclude by discussing why there was such a delay in the publication of thorough instructions for how to knit stockings in Sweden compared to Britain.


Heads, hands and feet: Examining the body of evidence for early knitting
Jane Malcolm Davies
– Associate professor of textile analysis, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Image made up of early modern knitted cap, waistcoat, gloves and stockings to illustrate 'Heads, hands and feet: Examining the body of evidence for early knitting' by Dr Jane Malcolm Davies

A selection of early historical items has been used to illustrate the development of knitting.1 Many of these were made to clothe the head, hands and feet.2 However, so far there has been no systematic study of this ‘body’ of evidence. As a result, it is not clear whether these extremities represent outliers in the data. There are many reasons why extant historical garments fail to illustrate what was actually worn in the past. Extrapolation from the few potentially extreme examples to the general is one of the limitations of current research methodologies in dress history. A more scientific approach may help to indicate their common and potentially characteristic features.3

Dress and textile history has evolved through preoccupations with class, gender, and communication, and via four main analytical frameworks: object-based research; the study of cultural context; personal practice; and production and consumption.4 It has been argued that such research has finally achieved ‘academic respectability’ with the adoption of interdisciplinary approaches drawing on material culture, ethnography, and cultural studies.5

This paper suggests that some of these research methods are not as well developed or integrated as they could be and that critical insights are currently overlooked. It also reports recent initiatives in knitting history research which suggest new ways of interrogating the body of evidence to fill these gaps.

Broadly speaking, data on the cultural context of dress and textiles come from the humanities while data on the material itself (the fibres and their processing) come from the sciences.6 However, between these two data sources there is the study of the object itself. A methodology for this has not been well documented in dress and textile history.7 Curators have published ‘how to’ guides8 and others have hinted at ways for detailed records of garments to be compiled.9 There is some instructive literature on textile structures which has been put to good use in archaeology.10 But a long-standing system for recording woven fabrics is not systematically employed by dress and textile historians.11 As a result, there is a lack of clarity on how to study an artefact as evidence in dress and textile history.

How the raw materials are transformed into textiles is also largely undocumented from an academic perspective (or, in some cases, with alarming inaccuracy)12 and there is a failure to capture garment construction techniques adequately. One of the contributory factors is the almost complete absence of craft expertise in the scholarly discourse of woven and non-woven historical textiles.13 An appreciation of craft practices bridges the divide between the study of the materials (fibres, processing and construction) and the study of meaning (culture and context). But expert craftspeople tend to be located outside traditional academic disciplines which is why their valuable insights go unrecorded. This is despite the fact that the importance of the intangible cultural heritage in craft has been recognised by UNESCO since 2003.14

The lack of both rigorous object-based research and craft expertise in the study of historical dress and textiles are particularly noticeable in research into the evidence for non-wovens and early knitting in particular.15 However, an EU-funded project, Knitting in Early Modern Europe (KEME) has tackled these gaps via a number of research strategies.

The Heads: Object-based research at the macro and micro-levels

A protocol for recording early modern knitted caps was developed with the aim of encouraging a uniform approach to ensure that data from different sources are easily comparable.16 It included specific dimensions such as crown diameter, circumference and brim widths, together with gauge and yarn diameter, which have not been routinely recorded for early knitted items in the past.17 The protocol for caps was then generalised for application to other early modern knitted garments.18 It has now been further tested in the study of knitted liturgical gloves.19

Samples were taken from a selection of the knitted caps to explore how the natural sciences offer potential insights into the objects at the micro-level. The aim was to employ research methodologies which have only rarely been put to the test on historical material20, although they are routinely employed in the archaeological sciences and conservation work. These techniques included USB microscopy to measure fibre diameters, scanning electron microscopy to investigate fibre structures, and radiocarbon mass accelerator spectrometry to attempt more accurate dating of the caps.21

The Hands: Citizen science research into craft techniques

KEME also included a reconstruction project which followed the lead of experimental archaeologists who have drawn on skilled craftspeople to test theories about spinning, weaving and dyeing.22 This ‘experimental history’ project explored the role of fulling in the production process for knitted caps.23 It followed guidelines for using experimental archaeology as a scientific method, which state ‘each test should be performed by at least two skilled craftspeople, in order to secure a more objective assessment of the results’.24 A mix of professional fibre processing experts and a team of citizen science volunteers knitted and fulled circular swatches to test a range of sheep’s fleeces for their fulling potential.25 This pioneering initiative embraced professional and amateur craft expertise in a new way for dress and textile history research. It has now been followed in two other early modern knitting research projects.26

The Feet: The future of online research collections

A major outcome of KEME was the creation of an online collection of knitted items to facilitate remote object-based study. The database now includes 68 caps and 96 examples of gloves but this will expand further to include extant early stockings as soon as funding permits. Some data on significant examples has already been collected and published for this using the KEME protocol.27

The aim of making the digital collection of ‘heads, hands and feet’ available online is threefold: to invite further study by researchers who lack the means to visit the items in person; to showcase material which is unlikely to be exhibited publicly in the near future; and to encourage craftspeople of all skill levels to reconstruct early modern knitted items to provide new insights into the production processes. The online collection conveniently gathers together geographically distant items which benefit from systematic comparison. It also widens public engagement with the evidence and has the potential to build a community of interdisciplinary experts and enthusiasts who can share research ideas.28


Rigorous object-based research (at the macro and micro-level) promised by scientific enquiry and the insights offered by craft expertise now need to be integrated into the interpretive framework of traditional contextual studies of dress and textile history. There is scope for interdisciplinary work on early modern garments as has been undertaken on prehistoric and ancient dress.29,30 The archaeological sciences and experimental archaeology have blazed a trail for innovative cross-cultural academic collaboration.31 Textile and dress history offers similarly fertile ground for new teams of collaborators to harvest new knowledge.

The addition of stockings (and eventually waistcoats) to the KEME online collection will flesh out the ‘body of evidence’ available for the study of early knitting. It will also widen participation in the debate about the craft’s origins and development, which are surprisingly mysterious given its relatively late appearance in the history of textile production processes.32


Wool hat (16th century): Bernisches Historisches Museum, Bern, Switzerland – inventory number 742

Silk gloves (17th century): Fashion Museum, Bath, UK – inventory number GCT 2007.25

Silk and gold camiciuola/waistcoat (1550-1600): Stibbert Museum, Florence, Italy – no known inventory number

Silk stockings (1640s): from Texel shipwreck, Museum Kaap Skil, Netherlands


  1. For example, Rutt , R (1987) A history of hand knitting. London: Batsford. Reprinted, Loveland, CO: Interweave Press; Thirsk, J. (2003) Knitting and knitware, c1500-1780. In Jenkins, D. (ed), Cambridge history of western textiles, 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 562-584
  2. Black, S. (2012) Knitting: fashion, industry, craft. London: V&A Publishing
  3. Mikhaila, N & Malcolm-Davies, J (2006) The Tudor tailor: reconstructing 16th century dress, London: Batsford, 8
  4. Skov, L & Melchior, M (2008) Research Approaches to the Study of Dress and Fashion. Creative Encounters, working paper 19
  5. Taylor, L (2002) The Study of Dress History, Manchester: Manchester University Press
  6. Conservators have an important role in this too: for example, Margariti, C (2019) FIBRANET database, Centre for Textile Research/University of Copenhagen – see
  7. Object-based studies have been documented from arts and humanities perspectives using models such as Kopytoff, I (1986) The cultural biography of things: commoditisation as process. Appadurai, A (ed), The social life of things, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-91. An appeal for ‘the real thing’ to find a place in costume history research was made in Tarrant, N (1999) The real thing: the study of original garments in Britain since 1947. Costume, 33, 12-22, 21
  8. Mida, I & Kim, A (2015) The Dress Detective: A Practical Guide to Object-Based Research in Fashion, London: Bloomsbury; Edwards, L (2017) How to read a dress: a Guide to Changing Fashion from the 16th to the 20th century, New York: Bloomsbury
  9. Prown, D (1982) Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method. Winterthur Portfolio, 17, 1, 1-19; Kraft, K (2003) Academic puppet plays? For an object-based fashion research. Waffen Und Kostumkunde, 45, 1, 77–96.
  10. Emery, I (1994) The primary structure of fabrics: an illustrated classification. London: Thames & Hudson; Seiler-Baldinger, A (1994) A classification of techniques. Belair: Crawford House Press; Walton, P & Eastwood, G (1988) A Brief Guide to the Cataloguing of Archaeological Textiles. York: Textile Research Associates, 4th edition.
  11. Centre International d’Etude des Textiles Anciens (2006) Vocabulary of Technical Terms: Fabrics, Lyon: CIETA
  12. Kerridge, E (1985) Textile manufactures in early modern England, Manchester: Manchester University Press
  13. A notable exception is Pink, A, Reimann, S & Jöeste, K (2016) Estonian knitting: traditions and techniques, Türi: Saara
  14. UNESCO (2003) Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris: UNESCO
  15. There are some studies which have set a good precedent by including essential details such as gauge but omit thread diameter – for example, Maj Ringgaard (2014) Silk knitted waistcoats: a 17th century fashion item. Engelhardt Mathiassen, T, Nosch, M, Ringgaard M, Toftegaard, K & Venborg Pedersen, M (eds) Fashionable encounters: perspectives and trends in textile and dress in the early modern Nordic world, Oxford: Oxbow, 73-104 and Malcolm-Davies, J & Davidson, H (2015) “‘He is of no account … if he have not a velvet or taffeta hat’: a survey of sixteenth century knitted caps” in Grömer, K & Pritchard, F – eds, Aspects of the Design, Production and Use of Textiles and Clothing from the Bronze Age to the Early Modern Era, NESAT XII (North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles), Hallstatt, Austria, May 2014
  16. Malcolm-Davies, J, Gilbert, R & Lervard, S (2018) Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting. Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 10-24
  17. Malcolm-Davies, J (2018) Sticks, stones, fingers and bones: nurturing knitting and the other neglected non-wovens. Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 3-9
  18. Lundin, H (2018) Knitted fragments of clothes excavated from the Swedish 17th century flagship Kronan. In Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 64-74; Willemsen, A (2018) Two knitted mittens from a 17th century Dutch shipwreck. In Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 75-82
  19. Thomas, A & O’Connell Edwards, L (2020) Holy hands: studies of knitted liturgical gloves. In Archaeological Textiles Review, 62, 170-174
  20. For example, dye, and radiocarbon dating and isotopic analysis: Walton, P (1981) ‘The Textiles’, Harbottle, P & Ellison, M – eds, An excavation in the Castle Ditch, Newcastle upon Tyne, Archaeologia Aeliana, 5th Series 9, 190–228; Von Holstein, I, Walton Rogers, P, Craig, O, Penkman, K, Newton, J & Collins, M (2016) Provenancing Archaeological Wool Textiles from Medieval Northern Europe by Light Stable Isotope Analysis (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H). PLoS ONE, 11, 10
  21. Malcolm-Davies, J (2019) Knitting comes of age: the development of a scientific approach to the study of  knitwork. Conservar Património: Studies in Historical Textiles, 31, 133-143; Malcolm-Davies, J (2017) Shedding light with science: the potential for 21st century studies of 16th century knitting. Journal of Dress History, 1, 83-91; Malcolm-Davies, J (2019) Speed Dating or Slow Dating? The Challenges of Interdisciplinary Analysis of Early Modern Materials. Dress under the Microscope: Contributions of Science and Technology to the Study of Early Modern Dress, Dressing the Early Modern Network conference, Lisbon, 12-13 September
  22. Kania, K (2015) Soft yarns, hard facts? Evaluating the results of a large-scale hand-spinning experiment. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 7, 113-130; Zagel-Mache Wolfe, U (2018) Grasping at Threads: A Discussion on Archaeology and Craft. Burke C & Spencer-Wood S (eds), Crafting in the World, Springer International, 51-73
  23. Davidson, H (2019) The Embodied Turn: Making and Remaking Dress as an Academic Practice. Fashion Theory, 23, 3, 329-362
  24. Andersson Strand, E (2014) Experimental textile archaeology. Andersson Strand, E, Gleba M, Mannering, U, Munkholt, C & Ringgaard, M (eds), NESAT X (North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles), London: Oxbow Books
  25. Malcolm-Davies, J & Mearns, R (2018) Finding a fitting fleece for fulling: The knitting in Early Modern Europe project. Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 36-45.
  26. Texel silk stocking project and workshops at the TRC, Textile Research Centre, Leiden, Netherlands – see (accessed 1 July 2021)
  27. O’Connell Edwards, L (2018) Knitted wool stockings in the Museum of London: A study of 16th century construction. In Archaeological Textiles Review 60, 42-51; Odstrčilová, S (2018) Early modern stockings in museums in the Czech Republic. In Archaeological Textiles Review 60, 51-63
  28. Malcolm-Davies, J (2018) Knitting virtual tribes together: new audiences for cultural objects. Florence Heri- Tech – The Future of Heritage Science and Technologies, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 364, 012031, 1-9
  29. Sørensen, T (2016) “In Praise of Vagueness: Uncertainty, ambiguity and archaeological methodology”, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 2, 741-763; Pollard, A & Bray, P (2007) A Bicycle Made for Two? The Integration of Scientific Techniques into Archaeological Interpretation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 245–259
  30. Harlow, M & Nosch, M-L (2014) “Weaving the threads: Methodologies in textile and dress research for the Greek and Roman World: the state of the art and the case for interdisciplinarity”, Harlow, M & Marie-Nosch, M-L – eds, Greek and Roman textiles and dress: an interdisciplinary anthology, Ancient Textiles Series, 19, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1-33
  31. Andersson Strand, E (2014) Sheep, wool and textile production, an interdisciplinary approach on the complexity of wool working. Wool Economy in the Ancient Near East and the Aegean: From the Beginnings of Sheep Husbandry to Institutional Textile Industr Oxford: Oxbow Press, Ancient Textile Series, 41-51
  32. Desrosiers, S (2013) Textile terminologies and classifications: some methodological and chronological aspects. Michel, C, & Nosch, M-L – eds, Textile terminologies in the ancient near east and Mediterranean from the third to the first millennia, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 23-51, 36


Holy Hands: Studies of knitted liturgical gloves
Dr Angharad Thomas
 – Independent researcher

This paper will present the findings of the Holy Hands project, which ran between March 2020 and August 2021, researching knitted liturgical gloves. This was the first systematic study of these magnificent items created for ceremonial use by elite churchmen, such as bishops. An interim presentation was given via Zoom to the Knitting History Forum meeting in November 2020, setting out the aims of the project and reporting on progress. This proposed presentation will give a full report on the findings of the project, which at the time of writing had located ninety-six artefacts (gloves, single gloves or fragments of gloves) in collections in Europe and North America. The presentation will also outline plans to continue the work into a larger scale study. It will be illustrated throughout with material produced in the course of the project and will show examples of the gloves studied. Despite being undertaken in the global COVID-19 pandemic, the Holy Hands researchers were able to fulfil its aims, gathering information on-line and communicating electronically. The availability of high quality images from on-line collections and catalogues made this possible, with the addition of the cooperation of curators and museum staff from many institutions who provided information and images.

The importance of liturgical gloves in the history of knitting cannot be overstated. Liturgical gloves were used in the Catholic Mass by bishops and archbishops and other senior churchmen, from about the 10th century until they fell out of use in about the 19th century. They have survived through different means, some being buried with their possible owner, usually a bishop, and some because of their importance as religious clothing, or their link to a saint. Many were acquired by private collectors in the 19th century and have since made their way into museums.

The earliest examples, from about the 10th century are made with knotting or looping techniques, of which about six pairs are extant. Gloves from the 12th century are however, knitted, the pair in the cathedral treasury of Saint Sernin, Toulouse, France, possibly being the earliest example of a knitted glove. They therefore exist over a period during which textile construction techniques underwent a change from long known methods, based on knotting or looping, to a new method, that of knitting. The means by which this change occurred is little known, although most sources agree that the new method came from the east across north Africa and then into Spain following the earlier Moorish invasions.

The focus of the Holy Hands project, knitted liturgical gloves, are typically extremely fine examples of textile manufacture. Most are complex gloves with shaped hands, fingers and thumbs, showing sophisticated construction methods including finger and thumb gussets. Many have knitted in patterns around the gauntlet, on the back of the hand (often the Christian IHS) and on the fingers. These patterns and other decorations are worked in fine metallic thread, comprising silver or gold wrapped around a silk core. Liturgical gloves are often trimmd with lace or tassels and some have medallions of enamel or embroidery sewn to the back of each hand. The most common colours are red or white with gold or silver metallic thread patterning.

The Holy Hands project had four elements: the presentation will present findings from each of these elements in turn.

Firstly, a database of all known extant liturgical gloves has been constructed. In June 2021 this had 96 entries, mostly pairs of gloves but some single gloves and some fragments, thought to have been gloves. The database records basic information for each entry such as institution and location, but also information such as possible provenance, construction details, measurements, yarns, and embellishments. This database is available on the Knitting in Early Modern Europe (KEME) site and will be introduced live on-line in the presentation, demonstrating its search facility and the quantity of material held in it.

Secondly, a review of the literature, an essential foundation of the study. Also available on the KEME web site, this brings together material from sources in several European languages. The review showed that most literature about liturgical gloves has looked at their role in the church service but that little has been recorded about the sources, manufacture, design and construction of them, thus confirming the value of the project and the gap in knowledge about these gloves.

Thirdly, a protocol has been developed for examining knitted gloves. Building on the documents published in the Archaeological Textiles Review, Number 60, a checklist for examining knitted textiles, and the terminology for describing knitted textiles, the Holy hands protocol adds two sheets, one for recording measurements and the second for recording photographs and notes made, with specific reference to gloves. The protocol will ensure that different researchers in different places will be able to add comparable data to the database, expanding our knowledge of these magnificent artefacts.

Fourthly, some reproduction of elements of liturgical gloves was undertaken by both researchers; Lesley selecting the pattering from the gauntlets of four gloves to chart and reproduce in fine hand spun silk and Angharad designing a pair that reference liturgical gloves in their use of patterns and details, worked in silk and metallic thread. These examples will be shown and the issues of finding appropriate contemporary materials and tools discussed. The value of this type of re-creation in giving insights into both working with the materials and the skills that knitter might need for the making of liturgical gloves is acknowledged.

Plans to extend and build on this study

The Holy hands project was designed specifically to form the basis for further study of liturgical gloves. It has amply shown that there is much scope for further research. By the time of this presentation, it is hoped that plans will be in place to find further funding to continue the work started in 2020-21.

This work might include more detailed study of gloves in collections and cathedral treasuries which are not on-line. When travel is allowed, these will have to be visited to confirm the existence of a small number of gloves in the database and to add observations to it. Many of the extant gloves need to be studied further to establish, observe and record features such as thread construction, dye stuffs used, and knitted construction. Gauge is not recorded for most of the known gloves and this would be noted; neither are yarn characteristics, and knowledge of these would expand our understanding of the construction of knitted fabric.

It is anticipated that a citizen science approach would involve participants in producing parts of gloves, or even whole gloves in a similar way to the KEME caps project, see KEME web site, and the Texel stockings project, Leiden 2019, to develop our understanding of the processes involved in the creation of these gloves.


Project Report. Archaeological Textiles Review, Issue 62, pp 170-174

Article. Journal of Dress History. Association of Dress Historians (in prep.)

Piecework (USA). Glorious Gloves. Feature and companion project for hand knitted silk gloves. Spring 2022. (in prep.)

Presentations made:

Knitting History Forum, November 2020

Knitting & Crochet Guild Oxford Branch meeting, February 2021

Centre for Textile Research Conference, University of Copenhagen, June 2021


From jorab (socks) to dastana (gloves): Tracing provenance of hand-knitting in the Indian Subcontinent
Pragya Sharma,
Indian Institute of Art and Design, New Delhi, India

Hand-knitting is a widely practised craft by women in contemporary India, irrespective of age, culture, or class and this has been the case since the 18th century. The earliest reference to knitting from the subcontinent is from the 17th century by Dutch colonisers (Rutt, 1987). Later known to have its origins in the widespread popularity of European traders and Christian missionaries in the 19th century, this colonial influence left a strong legacy especially in the states of Northern India that experience long periods of cold winter months. Initially introduced to schoolgirls and women to create warm socks (called jorab in Hindi) for winters, the artefacts evolved into hand-knitted blouses (borrowed from the Victorian blouse with the recent introduction of a covering for breasts to be worn with the sari for modesty concerns), caps, mufflers and gloves (called dastana in Hindi). Although the introduction of machine knitting in domestic households in the 20th century slowed down the  of hand-knitting, the technology intervention was short-lived with Indian women continuing the handcraft well into the 21st century.

Deemed as a feminine domestic craft, and having close associations with domesticity in colonial as well as post-colonial India, hand-knitting has evolved as a social and communal activity with women knitting in groups in warmer outside areas during the winter season. This was one of the main ways in which knitting as a social and communal activity, lead to its intense popularity among women. Through the study of the earliest recorded knitting artefacts created in the Indian subcontinent, usually from hand-spun and naturally dyed wool, the paper tries to build the provenance of hand-knitting and its associations with the widespread practice in the Northern India provinces. The craft was also practiced in jails and orphanages with possible influences derived from magazines carried by British women when they visited or moved to India that included instructions to create such knitted artefacts. The colonial influence was not only visible in performing knitting as a craft activity but specific techniques and designs were also reproduced like the Fair Isle pattern, intarsia or argyle cable pattern; such non-geometric motifs were specifically deemed to have a non-Indian origin (Rutt, 1987). Additionally, the paper studies the influence of these designs and patterns in contemporary hand-knitted artefacts with Indian women introducing their own design elements to the pattern based on functionality and use and often inspired by the regional visual language, giving an additional layer to the rich history.

The study incorporates research methodologies of literature review, study of archives and semi-structured interviews with makers. The research is built around Kullu socks – a specific type of hand-knitted long socks made from hand-spun mountain sheep, popular in the Northern state of Himachal Pradesh. Strongly inspired by European aesthetics, especially the pointed-toe design and drawing from the colourful striped pattern of a Kullu shawl, these socks have almost become emblematic of winter in hill stations; the design of these socks is more than a century old. The primary source of information for the study will be interviewing artisans involved in making these socks. Since the sale and popularity of these socks is largely restricted to a smaller region in Northern India, evidence will also be drawn from the domestic practice of hand knitting in other North Indian states of Haryana, U.P. and Punjab owing to their proximity to the Kullu region. The paper is thus an attempt to record the vast reservoir of undocumented oral history that lives with the older generation, stories of their mothers and grandmothers, the research builds the provenance of hand-knitting through the lens of jorab and dastana in 19th century India.

Keywords: Hand-knitting, Indian Subcontinent, Provenance, Kullu, Socks & Gloves


 Rutt, R. (1987). History of hand knitting. Knitting International, 94, 47-8.


Little 16th Century Feet. The hidden secret of Dutch Groningen´s knitted stocking of 1540, excavated in 2000 in the canal Gracht van Alva, Prinsenstraat 11 in Groningen and reconstructed in 2020 in the Netherlands.
Constance Willems – Designer, writer, researcher, The Netherlands.

Reconstructions of both knitted stockings from the canal Gracht van Alva

The small knitted stocking from the Canal of Alva with a length of just under 26 cm, has no back seam and shows no wear marks, not even on the sole of the foot. Most likely the stocking has never been worn at all. Holes in stockings were not repaired by “darning”, a technique not yet known in the 16th century, but by sewing on a woven piece of fabric or closing the hole by sewing it up like a seam. It was not until after 1560 that knitters were able to purl. Therefore, this stocking was knitted in the time before that, around 1540, because it still has a ribbed sole, where 2 needles were used to knit plain stitches. The other parts are knitted round with plain stitches on 4 steel needles.

At the time from which this stocking originated, there was no knitter’s guild in Groningen, let alone a specialized stocking knitter’s guild. In the Groninger tax administration there are no knitters mentioned either. Probably they earned too little to have to pay taxes in the 16th century. Knitted stockings as well as knitted berets were commodities in the Dutch 16th century. Knitted sleeves, like the sleeves on the island of Darken, are very rarely seen. This part of the Gracht van Alva, where the little stocking was found, is the area where tailors and knitters had their workshops at the time.

How knitting was done in those days, and with what kind of needles, becomes evident from this fragment of text by Johannes Schefferus: Lapponia, printed in Frankfurt in 1673. This book was translated into Dutch in 1682: Waarachtige en Aenmerkenswaardige Historie van Lapland en Finland, door Jan ten Hoorn, t´Amsterdam 1682.

“Sheep wool with hair from hares to make hats and sleeves. For they are fine just to take hair out of the hares and knit out the hats, just as one knits silk and wooen stockings in other parts of all Europe, they turn the thread of the wool around and knit with three or four small thin spikes of iron. The hats they make of it are as soft as swan down or the neck of a swan: those hats are wonderfully warm and protect the cold very well. In the same way they also make gloves or a kind of muffs, mittens said, as there is only the thumb on it that can decently withstand the cold.”

The little stocking in Groningen was knitted with a thin, very hard to the touch woollen yarn, using two threads on four fine steel needles. The cast-on of the knitted stocking is a so-called Middle East cast-on, a form of naalbinding that originates from Egypt. The stocking was knitted from the toe upwards. Decorations in the stocking, such as the two ribs at the top, were knitted straight and against the clock. The ribbed heel, which turned out not to be one at all, was knitted with plain stitches on two needles.

Back to my Groningen stocking; as I am reconstructing and have reached the point where I have to decrease the rows of the heel, something very special happens…. and what I thought the heel was, suddenly under my knitting hands, becomes a beautifully shaped part of the sole.

As long as the stocking has been preserved since it was thrown into the canal Gracht of Alva, it was folded in half. This way the beautiful sole part has never been seen. It was only during the knitting process that the secret of the stocking was revealed, almost 500 years later. The stocking has become a little knitted boot!  The sole of the Groningen stocking is 12.3 cm and therefore a current shoe size 20, for ages 12 to 16 months.

I made the reconstructions of the stocking in two colours. The colour in which it was dug up, brown, and a madder red version. The tiny felt knitted piece that was found with the baby stocking is a distinct red/purple colour. Probably the used red dye of the felt piece of fabric has been less water-soluble than the one in the knitted stocking itself.

Due to increasing trade in the 16th century, new dyes were also imported into Europe. Such as indigo from India and cochineal, dried scale insects from Mexico, dyes that were traded at international fairs, for example at the Amsterdam Stock Exchange at the time of Joost van den Vondel and Piet Hein, the Dutch knitting sea admiral, at the end of the 16th, beginning of the 17th century.

Dutch poet and writer Joost van den Vondel, 1587 – 1679, did not earn his money by writing literature and poetry but with his knitted silk stockings business in the Warmoesstraat 39 in Amsterdam. Piet Hein knitted silk stockings aboard his ships, as sea admiral in full armour, on top of the decks while his crew members were scrubbing the wooden floors below as they write in their diaries. See more of this and the story of Joost van den Vondel and Piet Hein in my latest book Mordacious Knits.

In 1993, in a cesspit near the Gracht van Alva in Groningen, an almost intact knitted and felted beret was found among the congealed dung. Dark in color, but similar in shape to the beret of Regnerus Praedinius, 1508-1559, as can be recognized from his paintings. Praedinius was rector at the St. Maartenschool in Groningen, a school that he brought to great prominence. For many he has been a man of great significance. Not only as a teacher and writer was he a central figure, but also for his relatives and friends. Regnerus died in Groningen on April 18, 1559, at the age of 51 and was buried in the Martini kerkhof. In this pit, remains of students and other professors of the Latin school, Sint Maartens, show that pieces of textile functioned as toilet paper. Remnants of cereal grains on the textiles, reveal rye, barley and buckwheat was on the menu at the school.

Hanna Zimmerman studied the Praedinius beret extensively and was able to reconstruct the knitting pattern. The knitted beret was felted at the same time. The felting technique is known as volting. Volters are very well known from the Southern Netherlands. Cloth hand volters are very well known from the Southern Netherlands. This cloth trade mainly flourished in Bruges and Ghent, now Belgium. The beret, now known as the Praedinius hat, has been reknitted by volunteers around the Aduarder Monastery Museum. The hat was then made into a fitting beret by felting. Felting, which involves considerable shrinkage, was done in the (late) Middle Ages by rubbing (knitted) wool and kneading it with marbles in warm urine. On a large scale, wool was felted by “dancing” on the soaked wool. Current felting techniques are analogous to the ancient method of volters. A hat becomes a fitting beret through vigorous kneading….

Knitting patterns for the little 1540 stocking and the Praedinius hat are available.


Knitwits: Knitting the Bluestockings
Nicole PohlOxford Brookes University, United Kingdom

This paper explores the material culture of the famous eighteenth-century salon of the Bluestockings with a specific focus on the material production and iconography of the ‘blue stockings’. The basis for the paper are the original letters written by the Bluestockings as digitised and edited by The Elizabeth Montagu Correspondence Online (EMCO).

The Bluestockings were a group of men and women who met in the London, Dublin and Bath homes of fashionable hostesses Elizabeth Montagu, Elizabeth Vesey (c.1715-91) and Frances Boscawen (1719-1805) from the 1750s. A second generation took the Bluestockings name into the 1780s. Together these women, and the eminent men who supported their endeavours, invented a new kind of informal sociability and nurtured a sense of intellectual community and potential. These assemblies differed from the traditional card-playing gatherings at the time by nurturing intellectual pursuits, polite conversation, philanthropic projects, and publishing ventures. The gatherings were similar to the French salons, also led by women, in their principles of polite sociability, a limited social mobility based on merit, and equality between the sexes based on rational friendship and intellectual exchange. They allowed middling class and aristocratic visitors to exchange ideas about politics, literature and culture and facilitated matchmaking between patrons and protégés.

The original bluestocking circle included the hostesses Elizabeth Montagu, Hester Thrale Piozzi, and Frances Boscawen. Guests were Hannah More, Mary Delany, Margaret Bentinck, Duchess of Portland, Elizabeth Carter, Sir Joshua Reynolds and his sister Frances, Frances Burney, Samuel Johnson, William Pulteney, 1st Earl of Bath, James Boswell, David and Eva Garrick, Edmund Burke, George Lyttelton, Mrs Ord, Mrs Crewe, and Benjamin Stillingfleet, amongst others.

Firstly, the paper traces back the origins of the iconic name, ‘Bluestockings’.

The general consensus is that it was the regular guest Benjamin Stillingfleet and his informal attire – worsted knitted blue stockings – that gave the salon its name. We will unpack and contextualise this idea that Stillingfleet’s knitted stockings were a sign of informality and possibly, financial deprivation. If we look at another source for the name Bluestockings, we are led to the contemporary and seventeenth-century French salons which were also labelled ‘bas bleus’. Here the colour blue indicated high fashion and wealth in opposition to Stillingfleet’s worsted stockings. Indeed, the colour blue as a dye for silks and wool was not a cheap or easy colour to work with. As this paper will show, the dyeing process was complicated and demanded expert skill.

It was mainly gloves, mittens and stockings that were hand-knitted in the period. Stillingfleet’s infamous stockings were produced from worsted, long staple and smooth yarn, fitting for these kind of garments but we have no evidence if his were specifically hand or frame knitted. In the period, stockings were knitted, either by hand or mechanically on the stocking frame.

Knitting was taught to the labouring poor or financially compromised middling classes in addition to spinning, plain sewing, mending and sampler making to teach also literacy, numeracy and geography. The first recorded knitting schools had been established in Lincoln, Leicester and York in the late sixteenth century.

The first mechanical knitting machine was the stocking frame, invented by William Lee of Calverton, near Nottingham, in 1589 and was widely used in the eighteenth century, as it sped up the production of knitted stockings significantly. This meant that commercial stocking knitting was increasingly mechanised but hand-knitting remained a source of income for the labouring poor until the early nineteenth century.

Knitting, plain sewing, spinning and mending were labelled as ‘work’, ‘plain work’ or ‘plain sewing’ described the making of undergarments and household linen. The Bluestockings were genteel women so they enjoyed the ‘fine’ or what was called ‘fancy’ work such as embroidery, shell and feather work for decoration, netting, and tatting. Decorative objects such as net purses or pincushions were made by well-to-do women to demonstrate their taste and skill. Even Queen Charlotte dabbled in spinning and tatting. These were skills for leisure and display of feminine qualities, not necessity. Even hand-knitting, increasingly became the domain of wealthier ladies who had the time to devote to developing the skill. The classist and Bluestocking Elizabeth Carter knitted and indeed was known for hiding behind her knitting and work basket in company as she was very shy.  A contemporary reported that she appeared in polite society with  ‘a plain undress cap and perfectly flat head , a small workbag hanging at her arm, out of which she drew some knitting as soon as she was seated’. But she herself wrote to her friend Catherine Talbot on October 21, 1751 she was not terribly successful at knitting and took about 1 hour to finish ‘a round’.

Carter’s mention of ‘round’ indicates also that knitting techniques were different in the eighteenth century. Hand knitted stockings were historically knitted ‘in the round’ with no seams at all, with all shaping for the calf and ankle integrated, and a turned heel and foot made.  Knitting needles/pins in the finer gauges were usually made of steel wire. The larger gauge needles used by Scottish bonnet makers were made of wood. And there were knitting needles of ivory and bone, too, which indicated the rank of the knitter. To date we are not sure if Carter or any other Bluestockings used knitting instructions or patterns. These were often amongst domestic instruction books such as recipe/household instruction books (see Lady Hotham’s recipe book, U DDHO/19/3, Hull History Centre), or later in the period, in periodicals.

To return to the point of departure of this paper, we will conclude that the ‘blue stockings’ became a fitting icon for the informal, intellectual, genteel and egalitarian (at least in terms of gender) sociability in eighteenth-century England. The colour blue indicated fashion and wealth and referenced the Bluestockings’ sociable predecessors, the seventeenth-century précieuses. Stillingfleet’s worsted blue stockings underscored the informality of the Bluestocking assemblies which distinguished them from their French counterparts as well as other courtly gatherings in England at the time. The general absence of knitting as an accomplishment favoured by the Bluestockings (except for Elizabeth Carter) also indicates the relevance of rank and financial security that determined women’s relationship to craft,  domestic skills, and the display of femininity.

But the label ‘Bluestockings’ became a label beyond the actual group of women – it came to designate, often pejoratively, a group of learned and intellectual women. A reviewer of the British Critic in 1823 blustered, ‘We heartily abjure Blue Stockings. We make no compromise with any variation of the colour, from sky-blue to Prussian blue, blue stockings are an outrage upon the eternal fitness of things….’ Whilst the Bluestockings in general did favour intellectual pursuits over feminine accomplishment such as ‘fancy’ work or at least did not see a conflict between intellectual and ‘fancy’ work, the increasing limiting socio-cultural milieu of the 1790s resulted in the mounting defamation of learned women. Thus, Lord Byron wrote in 1821 that fellow poet Felicia Dorothea Hemans should ‘knit bluestockings instead of wearing them’.

The paper will close with a brief reference to the designs of Kate Davies, the Scottish knit designer, and the Bluestockings Club established in May 2021.

CFP: Knitting History Conference 2021

Knitting History Forum TRC Leiden Conference 2019 – KHF Chair Prof Sandy Black models the EKHG Sanquhar gloves donated by Kirstie Buckland, see notes in 2019 AGM minutes and subsequent post on website – image 2019 by Christine Carnie
Knitting History Forum TRC Leiden Conference 2019 – image copyright 2019 by Christine Carnie

Are you still considering presenting a paper online at the Knitting History Forum Conference in November 2021? KHF welcomes original research papers from contributors around the world on items such as knitted hats, caps, bonnets, gloves, stockings or shoes, from any culture and within any historical period up to the end of the 19th Century. Why not put on your thinking cap this weekend and submit an extended abstract of between 1200 and 1400 words to KHF chair Prof Sandy Black on The deadline of Wednesday 30 June is just days away.


Images by Christine Carnie from the Knitting History Forum TRC Leiden Conference in 2019. Top image: Knitted socks in the TRC exhibition. Above left image: KHF Chair Prof Sandy Black models the EKHG Sanquhar gloves donated by Kirstie Buckland. See notes in 2019 AGM minutes and Christine Carnie’s conference report on the Knitting History website

KHF Conference 2021 Call For Papers

Knitting History Forum will be contemplating Heads, Hands and Feet for our 2021 conference. KHF is calling for original research papers on items such as knitted hats, caps, bonnets, gloves, stockings or shoes, within any historical period up to the end of the 19th Century. Contributors are invited to present for maximum 20 minutes plus 5 minutes Q&A, and abstracts will be published on the Knitting History website (

The deadline for submissions is 30th June 2021, just over three weeks from today. If you’re still adding finishing touches, please don’t delay – email Prof Sandy Black at and let her know you will be submitting an abstract.

Papers may examine any aspect of knitting history such as design and technical construction, materials, provenance and trade, social context or economic aspects related to the production and consumption of knitted artefacts. The Knitting History conference will be online and we welcome submissions from around the world.

Knitting History Forum Conference 2021 : Head, Hands and Feet will take place on Saturday 13th November 2021. All abstracts will be reviewed by a selection committee and decisions notified by 5th August. Further details are available here:

ADH New Research in Dress History Conference 2021

The Association of Dress Historians will hold its annual New Research in Dress History Conference virtually via zoom, from 7 to 13 June 2021. Billed as ‘a weeklong “festival” of dress history!’ it features 122 speakers across seven days, beginning every day at 12:00 noon (London UK time). The programme for Monday 7th June may be of particular interest to KHF members, as Jane Malcolm-Davies’ paper ‘Slow Seeing and Fast Forensics: The Usefulness of Radiocarbon Dating Early Modern Materials, 1450–1650’ addresses the use of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry in dating knitted fabrics, but there are many, many more papers introducing new scholarship on the dress of different cultures and periods. All of the conference presentations will be live and not recorded, so for some this may be an unique opportunity to see them. Tickets for this ambitious event start at £25. A 3-page conference schedule and a 146-page conference programme including all speakers’ abstracts and biographies are available. Visit the ADH conference website for more information and to download the booklets.

Early Textiles Study Group Conference 2021

The Early Textiles Study Group have issued a call for papers for their 2021 conference Legacy: textile studies, the past informing the present. The ETSG intends holding this in-person conference at the University of Manchester from 9th to 11th September 2021, though alternative arrangements for a virtual event may become necessary because of the continuing pandemic. Abstracts are invited of no longer than 250 words, to be sent together with your name and a brief biography to Cordelia Warr, The deadline for receipt of abstracts is 1st June 2021. Please see the attached leaflet or the ETSG website for more details.Early Textiles Study Group Conference 2021 leaflet flyer 'Legacy: textile studies, the past informing the present'

CFP – Knitting History Forum Conference 2021

Knitting History Forum Conference Saturday 13th November 2021

Heads, Hands and Feet

Call for Papers

Knitting History Forum/Early Knitting History Group Reconstruction Knitted Sanquhar Glove courtesy of Kirstie Buckland. PLEASE DO NOT USE IMAGE WITHOUT PERMISSIONFor this year’s Knitting History Forum conference we are calling for contributions on the theme of Heads, Hands and Feet.  As evidenced by the earliest artefacts that survive in museums and collections, much of the historical practice of knitting created coverings for the extremities of the human body, due to knitting’s flexibility, warmth and capacity for complex three-dimensional shaping.

We are inviting original research papers that focus on items such as knitted hats, caps, bonnets, gloves, stockings or shoes, within any historical period up to the end of the 19th Century.  Papers may examine any aspect of knitting history such as design and technical construction, materials, provenance and trade, social context or economic aspects related to the production and consumption of knitted artefacts. This list is not exhaustive so do feel free to propose other areas.

Please submit an extended abstract of between 1200 and 1400 words to the KHF chair Prof Sandy Black on by the deadline of 30th June.  All abstracts will be reviewed by a selection committee and decisions notified by 5th August. Contributors will be invited to present for maximum 20 minutes plus 5 minutes Q&A, and abstracts will be published on the Knitting History website (

The 2021 conference will be extended to a full day, and will take place online on Saturday 13th November with the Knitting History Forum AGM in the afternoon of Friday 12th November.

New Knitting History Events & Media

April may have been the cruellest month in T. S. Eliot’s eyes, but for many in the continuing COVID pandemic, January 2021 is far worse. Here is some good news to help KHF members keep going:

Curators’ Colloquium on Knitted Textiles

The University of Glasgow is hosting a free online colloquium on Friday 29th January 2021 from 13:30 to 16:00 GMT. This event will share knowledge and practice regarding the collection, conservation, preservation and interpretation of knitting collections. Knitting is often a hidden part of a national or local collection, yet given the importance of knitted textiles to Scotland and to so many very different nations and cultures, it is imperative to raise awareness and share information and knowledge so that garments which carry so much meaning are appreciated, preserved and interpreted. National collections may have specialist curators, but many other smaller museums and collections do not. The aim of the colloquium is to share knowledge and practices amongst curators and custodians. Speakers will include Carol Christiansen, Curator and Community Museums Officer at Shetland Museum and Archives; Jen Gordon and Federica Papiccio, Assistant Curators, Scottish Fisheries Museum, Anstruther, where they are responsible for the Scottish Gansey project; Frances Lennard, Professor of Textile Conservation at the University of Glasgow, who led the University’s Centre for Textile Conservation and Technical Art History until 2020; Lisa Mason, Assistant Curator in the Art & Design department at National Museums Scotland, Trustee of the Bernat Klein Foundation, and Membership Secretary of the Dress and Textile Specialists and Helen Wylde, Senior Curator of Historic Textiles at National Museums Scotland, responsible for European textiles and dress from the medieval period to 1850. Tickets and further information available here:

Knit back to the 1920s and 1930s

The LSE Library is hosting this free online event on Thursday 4th February 2021 from 6:30pm to 7:30pm GMT. ‘For those who enjoy an interesting piece of knitting’, the talk explores knitting patterns in interwar women’s domestic magazines with Dr Ellie Reed, of the year-long project Time and Tide: Connections and Legacies’ at Nottingham Trent University, who will focus on publications in the Knitting & Crochet Guild’s collection. A booklet containing stitch patterns will be available to attendees and there will be a social media hashtag to share the efforts of those intrepid knitters who have a go! Further details and a link to book tickets available here

Inside The Factory

And finally, there’s still time to catch the BBC’s ‘Inside The Factory’ episode on commercial sock-knitting in the UK. The programme includes visits to a sock factory in Leicester, a cotton spinning factory in Manchester and looks at Kitchener stitch and the First World War, as well as featuring Joyce Meader of The Historic Knit. You may have missed the original transmission, but it’s still available to watch online by viewers in the UK until June 2021 on BBC iPlayer. More details and a link to the programme available here

Knitting History Forum 2020 Conference Report

Due to the global pandemic, the KHF Committee decided to hold the 2020 AGM and Conference virtually and to extend a welcome to attendees from all time-zones around the world. The response was extremely enthusiastic and tickets were booked up very quickly. Approximately 120 attendees joined via Zoom from countries including the UK, USA, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Sweden, Finland and the Nether-lands.

Alongside the excellent presentations, fascinating points and questions were raised by participants via the Zoom chat function. Some of these have been included in this report. However, there is no doubt that the discussions will continue on the KHF group discussion forum, Please join in!

The morning began with a warm welcome from our Chair, Professor Sandy Black. After the AGM, which will be reported separately, participants joined one of two breakout groups. The first group was a show and tell open session, exploring “What I made during lockdown”. This session began with Susan North’s amazing crochet toys. During lockdown, Susan has so far crocheted forty-three different critters. Her creative and colourful creatures range from a selection of urban pests to an English beaver, a Highland cow and a Louisiana alligator. Her wide range of subjects also includes sea creatures, monsters and dinosaurs and her next project is a “creepy critters” collection!

Roxanne Richardson shared the extensive learning opportunities from knitting a 1920’s knitting pattern. The 1920’s jumper can be viewed on Ravelry and there is an accompanying video A link to a 1904 pattern ‘Edwardian Sweater’ can also be viewed on Ravelry.

Kirk Dunn, a textile artist who apprenticed with Kaffe Fassett, shared three hand-knitted stained glass windows that took 15 years to create.

Marleen Laag shared that the company EE Exclusives made a knitting wall-hanging for King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands, which had a lot of media coverage.

The second group attended two presentations by PhD candidates.

Michelle Hanks, London College of Fashion, considered knitting as a thinking tool in her presentation “I’ll have to knit about it”. Michelle selected four items from her research to illustrate her ideas and processes. A large knitted blanket project was a fascinating record of her own mood and feelings as compared to the same day’s Twitter headlines. A double-sided, reversible sweater with mirror-imaged lettering “Good enough” was extremely thought-provoking, especially when Michelle revealed her discovery that the words on the inside of the sweater became readable in selfie photographs. The links between the complexity of knitting project and an individual’s mood and feelings provided fascinating insights. Maintaining control over the knitted stitches was also considered as an important element linked to well-being.

Emily Rickard, Nottingham Trent University, introduced us to her free knitting experi-ments. These knitted responses are used as a means of exploring the use of creative, open-ended knitting as a form of journaling to record emotions, with consideration for mental well-being. A discussion point raised during the presentation suggested that free knitting has parallels with “automatic writing” and with Julia Cameron’s “morning pages”. Emily developed her free knitting proposals though interviews with knitters. This allowed her to establish clear parameters for her research. At the end of her presentation, Emily made a request for new participants to join her research. If you are interested in finding out more, please do contact her on

Gillian Vogelsang-Eastwood, Director of the Textile Research Centre (TRC), Leiden, The Netherlands, opened the afternoon Conference with her presentation about knitted highlights from the TRC Collection. In particular, the Socks & Stockings Exhibition (2019) featured exhibits from many different countries, and the results of the Texel Silk Stocking project led by Chrystel Brandenburgh. This exhibition included a wall of socks created with items borrowed from Annemor Sundbo’s Ragpile Collection in Norway Gillian showed a surprise object in this section — a knitted snake! This snake had been constructed using seventeen different styles of sock heels, demonstrating just how many techniques exist within only one aspect of sock knitting.

Lynn Abrams, University of Glasgow, presented an excellent overview of “From Fleece to Fashion: researching the history of knitted textiles in Scotland”. The following quote is from The University of Glasgow knitting and textile history blog, where you can find out more about Fleece to Fashion and other research projects. There are also links to the University’s own Cochno yarn. “This project’s aim is to transform understanding of a) creativity: the relationship between materials, designs, techniques, and skills used to produce knitted textiles across Scotland; b) authenticity: why and how knitted textiles have become synonymous with Scottish heritage and c) sustainability: how knitting has survived — through adaptation — as both an indigenous craft and industrial practice from the late-eighteenth through late-twentieth centuries, and what is required for its survival in the twenty-first century and beyond.”

Jade Halbert, University of Huddersfield, drew on her own family experiences in her fas-cinating talk, “Knitting for Money: homework in Glasgow and beyond in the 1980s”. Using interviews with her aunts and her mother, Jade described small-scale knitwear businesses that were set up and run within the Easterhouse area of Glasgow in the 1980s. Using knitting machines, her aunts made sweaters and cardigans and sold them to local residents. Jade highlighted the contrast between this machine-knitted garment production and her mother’s experience of hand-knitting garments for a “designer” shop. These ob-servations showed the difference between what the garment knitter was paid and how much a garment could subsequently be sold for. Several participants shared their own family experiences, including teaching machine-knitting and making garments for shops and local communities.

The 1980s theme continued into Sandy Black’s presentation,” On being a knitwear designer in the 1980s”. Sandy’s creative use of a wide range of different inspirations, including landscapes, texture and colour in her work, prompted many admiring comments in the chat. Sandy was also asked about her background in mathematics which prompted a discussion of the strong links between maths and science and knitwear design. The presentation concluded with the exciting news about Sandy’s forthcoming Crowood Press book! For the book ‘Classic Knits of the 1980s’, Sandy has recreated some of her favourite knitwear from the 1980s, placing them in context with the inspiration for the designs. Another of Sandy’s excellent books, ‘Knitting: Fashion, Industry, Craft’, is currently available from the V&A bookshop.

The next two presentations explored the subject of knitted gloves. In “Two pairs of 18th Century Abbess’s gloves from Prague”, Sylvie Odstrčilová, an independent researcher from the Czech Republic shared her fascinating research. The audience were entranced by Sylvie’s detailed examination of the construction of the gloves, especially the differences between the pairs of gloves that became apparent upon close viewing. For example, slits present on the thumb and two forefingers of each glove had several possible uses. Each were carefully considered by Sylvie before reaching the fascinating conclusion of linking them to rosary beads. Sylvie’s research will be published in the Archaeo-logical Textiles Review (no 62) at the end of the year. It will be free to access online from early January 2021.

Lesley O’Connell Edwards and Angharad Thomas, both independent researchers from the UK, introduced us to their current shared research, “Holy Hands: studies of knitted liturgical gloves”. In one section of their talk, they explained the development of a protocol to record observations where there are a large number of elements to be included. Deciding on a consistent approach to the order of examination is key to gaining an understanding of the gloves. When considering the reconstruction of a glove, several challenges emerged including charting the motifs and patterns, as well considering how colour-work was handled. The extremely fine gauge of the knitting was also highlighted. This prompted a fascinating discussion of the tools required to knit with this fine gauge silk. A participant suggested that fine smooth needles could have been supplied by goldsmiths or armourers. The project will also be written up as a work in progress report in Archaeological Textiles Review (no 62). Liturgical gloves can be found in the collection of the Worshipful Company of Glovers.

For the final presentation of the day, we were joined by Emily Whitted, PhD candidate from the University of Massachusetts, USA. Emily presented her Master’s research, “Made in Germantown: Analysis of an Early American Frame Knitting Industry”, tracing the life cycle of Germantown stockings as they passed through the hands of their makers, users, and repairers in eighteenth-century Philadelphia. To gain an understanding of frame knitting machine operation, Emily undertook hands-on research at Ruddington Framework Museum in the UK. Learning to set-up and make her own samples on a frame knitting machine showed her the complexity of working in this way. Her descriptions of carrying out repairs to the knitting machine and actually making the spare parts were in-sightful.

Thank you to the KHF Committee for organising and hosting this excellent event.

Please do keep in touch with Knitting History Forum through the following links to continue the excellent discussions and conversations started during the Conference.

Knitting History Forum the international society for the history of knitting and crochet. Eight-pointed star, a common motif in knitting across many cultures.

Emma Vining

Virtual Knitting History Conference 2020

Knitting History Forum would like to thank everyone, our excellent speakers, members, delegates and KHF friends old and new, for taking part in our first ever virtual AGM & Conference and for making it so enjoyable and interesting. The event was entirely online this year, perhaps the first virtual knitting history conference of its kind in the world but certainly, we hope, not the last! We would also like to express our thanks to KHF Chair Sandy Black and Treasurer Tricia Basham, who worked particularly hard both behind the scenes and onscreen on the day hosting the meeting. Speakers and delegates alike came from around the world, many joining us bright and early from time zones where lesser mortals were still asleep, yet all were fully engaged and enthusiastic. Questions and comments were insightful and discussion lively as ever, and though it was not possible to meet in person, this event brought us together, our shared interest creating sense of community and a buzz we hope will continue.

We look forward to seeing you all again in the future and though the conference has ended, you can still contribute and join in the conversation online:

2019 Knitting History Forum Conference Report

Knitting History Symposium
Conference organised by the TRC Leiden and the Knitting History Forum
Leiden, November 2, 2019


A Knitting Weekend in Leiden

Almost a year ago I spent a fantastic weekend all about knitting in Leiden, taking part in the Knitting History Symposium on the 17th century “Texel Silk Stocking” on Saturday and visiting the TRC Leiden where the KHF AGM was held on Sunday, as well as some of the sights of Leiden. I was so busy taking notes I did not take any pictures at the conference itself but I did in the exhibition on Sunday, which showcased most of the samples and reproduction stockings of the project.

The keynote lecture of the symposium was about the reconstruction of the 17th century Texel stocking finds by a citizen science community, under Chrystel Brandenburgh.

The stockings came from wreck number BZN17, and we now know it was an armed Dutch merchant ship that sank about 1645-1660.

The two goals for the project were to involve people who are not normally part of archaeological research but have the expertise needed for a reproduction, in this case experienced knitters, and to be able to repeat the experiment. More than a hundred people volunteered!

The original stocking was made from reeled, not spun, silk, and knitted in the round. It was examined with a Dino-Lite microscope. All information was gained from that examination, the stocking was not turned or otherwise disturbed.

The citizen science project involved knitting test swatches with different types of silk (some already de-gummed, some still containing the sericin, and different size needles, 0.7mm and 1mm, to find the right material and gauge for the reconstruction. The original measured 83 stitches and 100 rows for a 10cm square! The test pieces measured 5x5cm and took on average 5 hours to complete, and required 15m of silk, which means a stocking would need 1080m.

After the test swatch stage, about 40 people continued with the experiment by knitting a complete stockings, and as of the date of the conference 27 stockings were finished. Knitting with the silk that still contained the sericin proved easiest and quickest, and blocking the stocking after removing the gum also brought the most uniform result.

Using a wooden former to shape the stockings after washing (and de-gumming) was based on the existence of an extant example of the period in Denmark, and English records mentioning wooden stocking formers. Uneven knitting and a certain amount of difference in gauge did not matter after removing the sericin and blocking the stocking.

It is impossible to tell how long it would take to knit a stocking in period. Those knitters that knitted more than one stocking reported that the time it took to knit the second one was almost half of the first, showing how much familiarity with the material and the way to knit speeded up the process.

The papers in the Knitting History conference itself were all connected to the Texel Stocking project. The first section was about stocking production in Europe, showcasing current research in knitting history:

  • Lesley O’Connell Edwards’ “A hidden workforce: hand knitters in 17th century England” focused on evidence of who was knitting and what was being produced, and the research is centred on Norfolk and Suffolk. There is less information available on this topic for the 17th century than for the 16th century, and council and probate records are so far the best sources. Items produced by knitting included caps, gloves, petticoats (short jackets), stockings or hose, and waistcoats. There was no guild for knitters, but knitting was something taught, not necessarily learned in the family. Interestingly, although men were listed as teachers, very few men were listed as being taught. Silk hand knitters are mentioned in 1619 but there is not much more information about this aspect of knitting.
  • Sylvie Odstrcilova’s paper “Early modern stockings from the Czech Republic and neighbouring countries: The story continues” offered a fascinating glimpse into the variety of extant stockings in this area, and built on her research published in NESAT and ATR. Her findings of the similarity of the stockings of Imrich Thurzo in Orava Castle to the Texel stocking opened questions regarding manufacture and import of silk stockings throughout Europe.
  • Hanna Backstrom’s paper “The earliest printed knitting patterns” compared what the printed patterns looked like and who they were made for, to a hand written 17th century notebook, possibly from a knitter’s workshop. This was one of the highlights of the conference for me. It raised lots of interesting questions as to how they used the charts, diagrams and sketches contained in this book, especially in contrast to the printed books which seem to have been designed for a different audience.

The first afternoon section was dedicated to projects inspired by the Texel Stocking project:

  • Art Ness Proano Gaibor’s “Dye experiments on the Texel Stocking” was an interesting paper on how period dye recipes can have an impact on our modern lives, and how diverse the period recipes for dyeing black were – some doing more harm to the fabric than others.
  • Geeske Kruseman’s findings of her report “wearing 17th century knitted silk stockings” really surprised me. Two people wore two pairs of the stockings produced by the citizen science project with period reproduction shoes in everyday life and recorded their subjective and objective observations. Although the experiment was cut short, they still got some data. The stockings showed no signs of wear after an accumulated 139 hours of wear, kept their shape after washing, and were comfortable to wear in hot and cold weather. Afterwards everyone with the right foot size (European 38) got a chance to try the stockings , and I personally loved the experience! The stocking is very light and smooth to wear, you sort of forget you have it on, and the lack of stretch that we have come to expect from wool stockings wasn’t missed due to the garter holding the stocking up, and the fact that the stocking fitted me perfectly. It would be interesting to repeat this experiment with a wider range of participants.
  • Sally Pointer reported on her experience of making a replica for the re-enactment market based on the Texel stocking and using a 19th century knitting machine. She started with a wool version to test the design and then made a version with spun silk. She had to alter the key features to work with the much lower stitch count possible with the knitting machine, reducing the patterns produced by the purl stitches by about one third, and producing a stocking with a similar pattern but clearly different to the original. key question: “Though we can do it, should we?” The stocking she produced is much quicker to produce than the hand knitted ones, but still took a considerable time to make and it leaves the question how it would compare being worn to a non-patterned, machine-knit silk stocking and the replica hand knitted ones.

The last section consisted of papers based on Citizen Science Projects:

  • In “How not to knit: Sourcing silk, research and reconstructions reviewed” Susan North shared with us her insights into the problems encountered and mistakes made when making reconstruction silk stockings for the Original Practice at the Globe Theatre, and how difficult it was to find any information on tools, materials, and methods.
  • Jane Malcolm-Davies’ paper “Modern Slavery and the early modern work ethic: Lessons learned from volunteer participation in knitting in early modern Europe” gave insights into the experiences made by her and the volunteers in the Knitting in Early Modern Europe (KEME) project. She discussed how using volunteers in knitting (a notoriously underpaid work activity) raises the question to what extent Citizen Science is exploitative, and how much can be learned from the knitwork produced, and the process of knitting it. The focus has to be on what the benefits for the volunteers are as well as the researcher/scientist, and it is interesting that the KEME volunteers listed a similar range of benefits as the Texel stocking project participants.

The following panel discussion followed along similar lines, and I loved the new-to-me emphasis on the social aspect of taking part in a Citizen Science project, and the emphasis on being mindful of the nature of these experiments versus lab experiments, and that there have to be mutual benefits for the researcher and scientist as well as the volunteer.

My stay extended to Sunday for the Knitting History Forum AGM, and so I had a chance to visit the exhibition about the stockings in the Textile Research Centre, showcasing all the finished stockings, the former, all the samples and the ingenious holders some of the knitters had come up with to keep the cone of silk from unravelling while being able to knit off it easily. Also part of the exhibition was a treasure trove of patterned socks and stockings, and sample boards of different heel and toe varieties, as well as other knitting samples. I came away with so much inspiration!

We also were given a short tour of the facilities, making me want to come back to study some of the beautiful knitted and crocheted items in the collection. In the afternoon we visited the weaver’s house and the Laakenhal museum, all places I am looking forward to visiting again!

Christine Carnie

Knitting History Forum 2020 – Virtual AGM and Conference

TICKET BOOKING HAS NOW CLOSED. The 2020 edition of the Knitting History Forum Conference will be brought to you online via Zoom from several different locations.  Last year, as part of our visit to the Netherlands in collaboration with the Texel Stocking Project, the KHF AGM was hosted by the Textile Research Centre in Leiden.  We start our conference Knitting History Forum/Early Knitting History Group Reconstruction Knitted Sanquhar Glove courtesy of Kirstie Buckland. PLEASE DO NOT USE IMAGE WITHOUT PERMISSIONthis year with a presentation from the TRC’s director Gillian Vogelsang-Eastwood about their collection and will see some of its knitted items.

The next group of presentations focus on the experience of knitting at home with examples from research based in Scotland and elsewhere.  Lynn Abrams will give an overview of current research into the history of knitted textiles in Scotland, followed by Jade Halbert speaking about knitting for money as a homeworker in the 1980s.  Sandy Black responds to this with her personal perspective of being a knitwear designer and producer in the 1980s.

We then return to the early history of knitting with two presentations on gloves worn by religious figures.  The first, from Sylvie Odstrčilová in the Czech Republic discusses two pairs of 18thC Abbess’s gloves from Prague, and the second reports on a project by Angharad Thomas and Lesley O’Connell Edwards, mapping the existing liturgical gloves as worn by bishops from the sixteenth century. We conclude with a talk by Emily Whitted from Massachusetts USA on the stocking frame knitting industry in Germantown, near Philadelphia, including Emily’s experience of trying out frame knitting herself in Ruddington Museum.

Join us for a pre-session Show and Tell (including what did you make during lockdown?) or see and respond to the fascinating new knitwork produced by Michelle Hanks as part of her PhD research.

See the detailed schedule below…

We look forward to seeing you online on 7th November via Zoom.  It’s free for everyone but donations to Knitting History Forum are always welcome by Paypal to

Please register via the Eventbrite link below and joining details will be sent to you.

Best wishes

Sandy Black

Chair, Knitting History Forum





Knitting History Forum 2020  AGM and conference – Saturday 7th November via Zoom 


We ask for your understanding if the schedule is subject to change at short notice due to the current pandemic.

10.30 -11.00 am Welcome and AGM  – see separate agenda (to follow)

Breakout groups

11.30 – 12.30pm Show and Tell open session – Moderator:  Tricia Basham

  • Bring along something to show and discuss  including “What I made during lockdown” – kicked off by Susan North’s crochet toys.


11.30 – 12.30 pm PhD research student presentations – Moderator: Sandy Black

  • 11.30 Michelle Hanks, London College of Fashion “I’ll have to knit about it…”  Knitting as a thinking tool Showing her knitted pieces made whilst exploring ideas in response to interviews with knitters
  • 12.00 Emily Rickard, Nottingham Trent University Exploring the use of creative, open-ended knitting as a form of journaling to record emotions, with consideration for mental wellbeing

Break or keep chatting informally

1.20 pm conference welcome: Sandy

1.30 – 2pm    The Collection of the Textile Research Centre Leiden, with some knitted highlights.
Gillian Vogelsang-Eastwood, Director of the TRC Leiden, The Netherlands

2 – 2.15     From Fleece to Fashion: researching the history of knitted textiles in Scotland
Lynn Abrams, University of Glasgow

2.15 – 2.45    Knitting for Money: homework in Glasgow and beyond in the 1980s
Jade Halbert, University of Huddersfield

2.45 – 3.15   On being a knitwear designer in the 1980s
Sandy Black,  London College of Fashion, UAL


3.30 – 4.00   Two pairs of 18thC  Abbess’s gloves from Prague
Sylvie Odstrčilová, Independent researcher, Czech Republic

4. – 4.30      Holy Hands: studies of knitted liturgical gloves
Lesley O’Connell Edwards and Angharad Thomas, Independent researchers, UK

4.30 – 5      Made in Germantown: Analysis of an Early American Frame Knitting Industry 
Emily Whitted, PhD candidate, University of Massachusetts, USA

5 – 5.05      Closing remarks – Sandy Black

ADH Lecture & Conversation Series

The Association of Dress Historians are launching an ADH Lecture & Conversation Series and have issued a Call For Submissions with a deadline of 1 October 2020. The aim of the ADH Lecture & Conversation Series is to provide a virtual space for ADH members to connect and share knowledge about dress history. Knitting and crochet intersects the history of dress – perhaps KHF members would consider a submission? For further information visit the ADH website:

ADH Lecture & Conversation Series

Knitting History Forum AGM and Conference 2020

Saturday 7th November 2020

In order to recognise the extraordinary circumstances of the 2020 global coronavirus pandemic, the Knitting History Forum has decided to stage an online event on Sat 7th November. This event will be free to attend and open to all, following registration, and will comprise speakers, discussion groups/show and tell and opportunities for research students to give short presentations or present posters online of their current work-in-progress.

Watch this space for further announcements!

Knitting History Forum AGM & Conference 2020

This has been an extraordinary year. Many have been affected by the events of the past ten months and it seemed in poor taste to continue posting. Indeed, mentions of the date of the next conference here and on social media received some objections and though made last year, were removed to avoid giving offence. Now as we return slowly to the new ‘normal’, it seems appropriate to resume. KHF is pleased once again to confirm Saturday 7th November 2020 as the date of this year’s Knitting History Forum Conference. We are working towards an event that is safe and accessible. Further information about the conference will be released in due course and we will post additional details here on the Knitting History website and on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook when they are available. We hope you will feel able to join in and look forward to seeing you in November.

Knitting History Forum Conference 2019 Reminder

Join us in beautiful Leiden for a weekend of Knitting History! We welcome scholars, knitters and everyone with an interest in knitting.

The Knitting History Forum Conference 2019 with the culmination of the TRC Leiden Texel Stockings Project is on Saturday 2 November at De Tuinzaal (The Garden Room) at the Grand Café de Burcht in the historic city centre (at Burgsteeg 14). On Sunday 3 November Prof Sandy Black will chair our AGM for KHF members and we have a special visit to Het Leids Wevershuis (a textile workers’ house built circa 1560). The knitting exhibition ‘Socks & Stockings: A world full of surprises’ at the Textile Research Centre will open especially for conference delegates on Friday 1 November from 12.30pm to 2pm and again on Sunday 3rd November 10am to 12.30pm.

You can register for the conference and pay on the door (€25 or €15 for KHF members).

If you prefer you can pay in advance via PayPal using the “Donate” button on the home page of the Textile Research Centre – scroll down the right-hand column) or via PayPal directly to the TRC’s email address ( Please visit our membership page for more information about Knitting History Forum and apply to join if you wish. You can also register for the conference online using this form if you are a KHF member or use this form if you are not. The conference hotel is Hotel Nieuw Minerva and a discount is available – email mentioning KHF2019.

The full conference programme is available here. Speakers and papers for the Knitting History Conference will include

Keynote speaker Chrystel Brandenburgh: ‘Knitting for science. The reconstruction of the 17th century Texel Stockings by a citizen science community’
Lesley O’Connell Edwards: ‘A hidden workforce: hand knitters in 17thcentury England’
Sylvie Odstrčilová: ‘Early modern stockings from the Czech Republic and neighbouring countries’
Hannah Bäckström: ‘The earliest printed knitting patterns’
Art Ness Proaño Gaibor: ‘Dye-experiments on the Texel Stocking’
Geeske Kruseman: ‘Wearing 17th century knitted silk stockings’
Sally Pointer: ‘Clues from the deep: Reconstructing for the re-enactment-market -silk stockings based on the Texel project’
Susan North: ‘How not to Knit: Sourcing silk, research and reconstructions reviewed’
Jane Malcolm-Davies: ‘Modern Slavery and the early modern work ethic: Lessons learned from volunteer participation in knitting in early modern Europe’
Panel discussion with Katrin Kania, Heleen van Londen and Roeland Paardenkoper: ‘Knitting leads the way! The perils and potential of citizen science in textile research’

It is not too late to register for the conference and book last minute flights, Eurostar tickets or even drive to Leiden to enjoy a knitting history event which, in a way, is itself historic. We look forward to seeing you this weekend.

Socks & Stockings Knitting Exhibition

A new exhibition, ‘Socks & Stockings: A world full of surprises’, has opened at the Textile Research Centre in Leiden , tying in with the Texel Stockings Project and our 2019 Knitting History Forum conference. On display are the original seventeenth century Texel silk stockings, the hand-knitted reconstructions made by the team of volunteers for the project as well as many socks from around the world in knitting and nalbinding, including some from Annemor Sundbø’s “Ragpile-collection”, in an informative and fascinating array of techniques, patterns and colours as inspirational to knitters as scholars and students of knitting history. The exhibition runs until 19 December 2019 but is also opening especially for us on Friday 1 November from 12.30pm to 2pm and again on Sunday 3 November from 10pm to 12.30pm, so Knitting History conference delegates may enjoy viewing at leisure.

The text boards accompanying the exhibits are also available to read in PDF format, English language and Dutch language formats. More information and images of some of the items are available on the TRC Leiden website.

Knitting History Forum & TRC Leiden Conference & KHF AGM 2019

The weekend of the KHF Conference & AGM 2019 approaches quickly : Saturday 2nd & Sunday 3rd November 2019. For those who still might be considering joining us for the weekend here is a reminder of the registration details.

The Knitting History Forum Conference is on Saturday 2nd November and a copy of the conference programme is available here

Conference delegates are also encouraged to support the Knitting History Forum. The annual fee is £25 and you can join via the Membership page.

Please register for the conference (Sat 2 Nov) and/or participation in the AGM (Sun 3 Nov) using this link:

Then, pay for your ticket for the conference via PayPal using the “Donate” button on the home page of the Textile Research Centre ( – scroll down the right-hand column) or via PayPal directly to the TRC’s email address (

Normal entrance fee is €25, but for KHF members this is reduced to €15. This is the link for members of KHF to register:

If you have any problems registering via the google form or payment to the TRC Leiden, please email the TRC directly (

Knitting History Forum the international society for the history of knitting and crochet. Eight-pointed star, a common motif in knitting across many cultures.

On Sunday 3rd November, Gillian Vogelsang-Eastwood, Director of the Textile Research Centre in Leiden, will host us at the TRC, for the Knitting History Forum Annual General Meeting, followed by a visit to the Wevershuis Museum.

You are welcome to arrive from 10am and we will start the AGM promptly at 10.30am, dealing with KHF business and planning for the year ahead. The meeting will close by 12 noon and we recommend everyone finds their own lunch in the old town centre (minutes of AGM 2018, more info and suggestions of places to eat will follow a fortnight before the event).

Reconstruction Knitted Sanquhar Glove courtesy of Kirstie Buckland. PLEASE DO NOT USE WITHOUT PERMISSION!

In the afternoon there will be the opportunity to visit the Wevershuis Museum (The Weaver’s House), Middelstegracht 143, 2312 TV Leiden.

Geeske Kruseman has kindly offered to give tours; the museum is very small and has an interesting collection showing the “other side of Leiden”, located in the old town centre and less than one kilometre from the Textile Research Centre.

The tours will last 45 minutes and cover Leiden textile history, the building’s history, and some social history. The first tour will be at 1.45pm and the second at 3pm and we will meet outside the museum 10 minutes before the start of the tour so that we can all go in as a group. (i.e. 1.35pm and 2.50pm).

If you are with us on Sunday please email KHF Membership Secretary Tricia Basham ( as soon as possible to let her know which tour you’d like to attend so that we can finalise arrangements.

The conference hotel is Hotel Nieuw Minerva and a discount is available – please email mentioning KHF2019 to book your room.

We look forward to seeing you all in Leiden.

KHF TRC Leiden Conference 2019

This year’s Knitting History Forum will be venturing out to picturesque Leiden in The Netherlands for a special event focused around seventeenth century knitted stockings. Please join us!

Knitting History Forum Invitation to Leiden 2019

Held jointly with the Textile Research Centre Leiden, the conference will include a full day of lectures about the Texel shipwreck reproduction silk stockings project, stocking production, studying historical knitting and textile research. The date of the knitting history conference is Saturday 2nd November 2019, with the KHF AGM held on Sunday at the TRC. Click on the images or download the PDF to learn more. Further information will be available on the Knitting History Forum website once details are confirmed.